| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Fractenna" wrote in message ... There were bunch of articles promising miracles, but it did not work according to the promises, otherwise we would hear about it, see them around. Very interesting. Can you point out the citations of these articles promising miracles? Let's do it differently: you point out single Cell phone, Wi-Fi or other consumer gadget that uses Fractal antenna. Point out any other application when the fractal antenna made difference. Of course I could. But, even I can be convinced that a NG is not the site for commercial marketing, Andrey. No reason to do it differently; I have invited you to make citations So...maybe I and others will learn something? I will be happy to briefly discuss the technology and not the commercial products, however. There is no question that in some single band cases, there are many different solutions that will meet a highly compromised need. The value equation in performance and cost, does, shall we say, benefit from the huge design space available with fractal antenna designs in other circumstances. That is, 99% of real needs. The price of cell phone antennas has dropped from about $1.20USD to less than $0.09USD in the last 8 years. Let's say that in high volume (and for a given model, its actually not that high)the COGS is $0.06USD PU. Now pay the insurance premiums that the brain cancer litigation issue--an ongoing one, I might add-- adds. Suddenly, there's no reason to be in cell phones, unless you want to have a high chance of going out of business--as many antenna companies have; seems like one or two goes under every month or so. Obviously some folks want to continue to take that risk. I'm not going to provide a list for you of products on this NG: customers, from my observation, want the emphasis to be on their product and not on a component in that product. I certainly know of applications in those markets you describe, in addition to emerging markets along those lines. Of course, there is no reason why YOU can't spend some money and pop some tops. Fractal antennas have made profound differences in the lives of many in the last few years, through their unique benefits in: smaller size; widebandedness; multibandedness; embedded/covert placement, control of observables; and so on. The early adopters have embraced the technology, and wireless commercial sector you allude to, after a very tough 2003, is coming back well. So, you can see that the reality is very different from your statement. Or maybe you can't see that, in which case you should listen to someone who knows the reality. I hope this helps. If you have commercial interests you know where to reach me off NG. Otherwise, it all goes outside of the scope of this forum, doesn't it? 73, Chip N1IR |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Fractal antennas | Antenna | |||
| FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
| current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
| Are fractal antennas being used in cellphones? | Antenna | |||