"Fractenna" wrote in message
...
Sheesh, how stubborn/bull-headed are you??? If my customers had to go
thru
this much to get info, I would have closed down years ago.

I presume your customers have the advantage in that you identify yourself
to
them, Andrew.

I have no idea who you are.

As I said, drop me a line. I've already gone the extra mile.

Best wishes,
Chip N1IR

And when did you fully identify YOURSELF, Chip? Were we supposed to look on
your Fractal Antenna Systems Web site? From that site:

"Fractal Antenna Systems, Inc. was founded in 1995 by Nathan Cohen, now a
recently retired Boston University telecommunications professor and radio
astronomer."

And from the ARRL call sign server:

COHEN, NATHAN L, N1IR (Extra)

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:16:21 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:

"Fractal Antenna Systems, Inc. was founded in 1995 by Nathan Cohen, now a
recently retired Boston University telecommunications professor and radio
astronomer."

Hi John,

Your information is incomplete. The records at that time described it
as a small extension campus largely devoted to Home Economics studies.
There could be some confusion about just who you have researched
however. Some years ago we had at least half a dozen "personalities"
all writing from this account or claiming to be different individuals
(or the same individual, it was hard to tell).

One common modus operandi was in (their/his/her) attempting to build a
data base by cultivating personal and business information in this
group, then sending harassing correspondence. If there is any doubt
about who/what/when/why the archives are choked with this Soap Opera.
Simply Google search the newsgroups with terms: "suit," "our lawyers,"
"your lawyers," "cease," "copyright infringement," and the ever famous
"protected by patents pending." Correlate these terms to recognizable
authors and all should come into resolution. :-)

Boy, I've met some goofballs during my days with the Voter's Drive.
Makes this stuff seem like a tired retread - wait! It IS a tired
retread.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

It IS a tired
retread.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC



Please ID the "techno-fraud" which you expose in your fractal antenna
website--that's your word. And what patents do you claim your amateur web page
has manage to render useless? Hmmm:-)?

And what exactly is this early 1800's prior art you allude to that renders
fractal antennas as public domain? Perhaps you have a knowledge base which
extends before Hertz, and even Maxwell:-)?

I am sure I am not the only one who would share the fascination of details to
your claims.

You are not a man short of words; use a few words to flesh it out, kindly.

73,
Chip N1IR

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:16:21 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:

"Fractal Antenna Systems, Inc. was founded in 1995 by Nathan Cohen, now a
recently retired Boston University telecommunications professor and radio
astronomer."

Hi John,

Your information is incomplete.

Hi, Richard -

It isn't my information. It came off the Fractal Antenna Systems Web site.

Nevertheless, it doesn't matter any more. I've killfiled him because I
believe he has nothing of value to contribute to this group and is
essentially trolling. This a game to him.

John

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 03:40:53 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:

It isn't my information. It came off the Fractal Antenna Systems Web site.

Hi John,

Possibly a mistake of association then. Historically, correspondence
from this account has offered a multiplicity of supposed authors hence
authenticity is dubious at best.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Hi John,

Possibly a mistake of association then. Historically, correspondence
from this account has offered a multiplicity of supposed authors hence
authenticity is dubious at best.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC




Hi Richard,

Please ID the "techno-fraud" which you expose in your fractal antenna
website--that's your word. And what patents do you claim your amateur web page
has managed to render useless? You said this too.Hmmm:-)?

And what exactly is this early 1800's prior art you allude to that renders
fractal antennas as public domain? Perhaps you have a knowledge base which
extends before Hertz, and even Maxwell:-)?

I am sure I am not the only one who would share the fascination of details to
your claims.

You are not a man short of words; use a few words to flesh it out, kindly.

73,
Chip N1IR

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 03:40:53 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:

It isn't my information. It came off the Fractal Antenna Systems Web site.

Hi John,

Possibly a mistake of association then. Historically, correspondence
from this account has offered a multiplicity of supposed authors hence
authenticity is dubious at best.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


Your stilted language is difficult for me to understand, Richard.

To what account are you referring?

Do you mean the association of Cohen to Fractal Antennas to N1IR? It is a
coincidence that a person who uses the screen name fractenna and signs his
posts as N1IR happens to have the same name as the person who founded
Fractal Antenna Systems, lives in the same area, and vehemently supports
fractal antennas?

John

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:24:45 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:
?

Hi John,

Historically, there have been MANY authors, all making claims to be
different persons OR there has been ONE author claiming to be
different persons FROM ONE account that is not a professional address.
ALL supposed authors claim to be working for a commercial business
selling fractal antennas. However, this is strictly speculation as
absolutely no evidence of this commercial pursuit is apparent in ANY
correspondence.

Stilted or otherwise, the confusion resides at one common point
originating these messages. In just the past week I've seen several
messages posted by two sides of a dialogue BOTH claiming to be the
same correspondent from different addresses. Signatures at the bottom
of a post are a wholly insecure means of asserting identity. Further,
individuals attempting to draw you into commercial correspondence
through non-commercial addresses (accounts) are the leading form of
Phishing. I hope this last term is not lost on you.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:24:45 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:
?

Hi John,

Historically, there have been MANY authors, all making claims to be
different persons OR there has been ONE author claiming to be
different persons FROM ONE account that is not a professional address.
ALL supposed authors claim to be working for a commercial business
selling fractal antennas. However, this is strictly speculation as
absolutely no evidence of this commercial pursuit is apparent in ANY
correspondence.

Stilted or otherwise, the confusion resides at one common point
originating these messages. In just the past week I've seen several
messages posted by two sides of a dialogue BOTH claiming to be the
same correspondent from different addresses. Signatures at the bottom
of a post are a wholly insecure means of asserting identity. Further,
individuals attempting to draw you into commercial correspondence
through non-commercial addresses (accounts) are the leading form of
Phishing. I hope this last term is not lost on you.


It is not. Thanks.

John


73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Hi John,

Historically, there have been MANY authors, all making claims to be
different persons OR there has been ONE author claiming to be
different persons FROM ONE account that is not a professional address.
ALL supposed authors claim to be working for a commercial business
selling fractal antennas. However, this is strictly speculation as
absolutely no evidence of this commercial pursuit is apparent in ANY
correspondence.

Stilted or otherwise, the confusion resides at one common point
originating these messages. In just the past week I've seen several
messages posted by two sides of a dialogue BOTH claiming to be the
same correspondent from different addresses. Signatures at the bottom
of a post are a wholly insecure means of asserting identity. Further,
individuals attempting to draw you into commercial correspondence
through non-commercial addresses (accounts) are the leading form of
Phishing. I hope this last term is not lost on you.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


Hi Richard,

This READS like language, but doesn't really say anything, IMO.

Please ID the "techno-fraud" which you expose in your fractal antenna
website--that's your word. And what patents do you claim your amateur web page
has managed to render useless? You said this too.Hmmm:-)?

And what exactly is this early 1800's prior art you allude to that renders
fractal antennas as public domain? Perhaps you have a knowledge base which
extends before Hertz, and even Maxwell:-)?

I am sure I am not the only one who would share the fascination of details to
your claims.

You are not a man short of words; use a few concise words to flesh it out,
kindly.

73,
Chip N1IR