Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil,
Here's the deal. I will assume the low intensity tail light and the high intensity brake light share the same LEDs. In a typical system there will be 10's to even 100's of LEDs. The required light output from the tail light function and brake light function is quite different. I have seen numbers from ranging from 7:1 up to 15:1. Let's say that the brake light requires 10X the output required from the tail light. Contrary to what was posted earlier in this thread, the light output from LEDs is roughly linear with forward drive current over several orders of magnitude. This is true up to nearly the point where the device explodes from overheating. So why not just change the DC current to get the varying output required? The problem is device matching. As you well know all semiconductor devices are subject to significant performance variation depending on exact process conditions, materials, phase of the moon, or whatever. LEDs are typically specified at one nominal current, with a nominal light output. When used at the nominal conditions a batch of LEDs can be selected to match light output performance so that no obvious visual artifacts appear. However, if these same matched LEDs are driven at significantly different conditions, the light output will have wider variation, perhaps detectable to the ordinary observer. Therefore the recommended method for reducing light intensity from a matched array of LEDs is to operate at nominal electrical conditions, but at a reduced duty cycle. I do not know the details of the vehicle you observed, but it is likely that the brake light function uses DC or a high duty cycle pulse, while the tail light uses a low duty cycle pulsed activation. There are other issues such as temperature variations and dealing with non-functioning LEDs, but that is enough for now. 73, Gene W4SZ Cecil Moore wrote: It appeared that they were all pulsed at once. Perhaps I should have used the word "pulsed" to avoid confusion in the RF analog (non-digital) world. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene Fuller wrote:
I do not know the details of the vehicle you observed, but it is likely that the brake light function uses DC or a high duty cycle pulse, while the tail light uses a low duty cycle pulsed activation. Thanks very much, Gene, for that information. I only observed the pulsed taillight function and not the braking function so the above explanation didn't occur to me. Makes a lot of sense now. Thanks again. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: J.W.Miller AT-2500 Auto Tuner on eBay | Equipment | |||
FA: J.W.Miller AT-2500 Auto Tuner on eBay | Equipment | |||
FA: J.W.Miller AT-2500 Auto Tuner on eBay | Equipment | |||
Wanted- auto ATU for IC706 | Equipment | |||
Auto Ant. Tuner Questions | Antenna |