Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 7th 05, 06:25 PM
Gene Fuller
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cecil,

Here's the deal.

I will assume the low intensity tail light and the high intensity brake
light share the same LEDs. In a typical system there will be 10's to
even 100's of LEDs. The required light output from the tail light
function and brake light function is quite different. I have seen
numbers from ranging from 7:1 up to 15:1. Let's say that the brake light
requires 10X the output required from the tail light.

Contrary to what was posted earlier in this thread, the light output
from LEDs is roughly linear with forward drive current over several
orders of magnitude. This is true up to nearly the point where the
device explodes from overheating.

So why not just change the DC current to get the varying output required?

The problem is device matching. As you well know all semiconductor
devices are subject to significant performance variation depending on
exact process conditions, materials, phase of the moon, or whatever.
LEDs are typically specified at one nominal current, with a nominal
light output.

When used at the nominal conditions a batch of LEDs can be selected to
match light output performance so that no obvious visual artifacts
appear. However, if these same matched LEDs are driven at significantly
different conditions, the light output will have wider variation,
perhaps detectable to the ordinary observer.

Therefore the recommended method for reducing light intensity from a
matched array of LEDs is to operate at nominal electrical conditions,
but at a reduced duty cycle.

I do not know the details of the vehicle you observed, but it is likely
that the brake light function uses DC or a high duty cycle pulse, while
the tail light uses a low duty cycle pulsed activation.

There are other issues such as temperature variations and dealing with
non-functioning LEDs, but that is enough for now.

73,
Gene
W4SZ




Cecil Moore wrote:


It appeared that they were all pulsed at once. Perhaps I should
have used the word "pulsed" to avoid confusion in the RF analog
(non-digital) world.

  #2   Report Post  
Old January 7th 05, 07:46 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gene Fuller wrote:
I do not know the details of the vehicle you observed, but it is likely
that the brake light function uses DC or a high duty cycle pulse, while
the tail light uses a low duty cycle pulsed activation.


Thanks very much, Gene, for that information. I only observed
the pulsed taillight function and not the braking function so
the above explanation didn't occur to me. Makes a lot of sense
now. Thanks again.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA: J.W.Miller AT-2500 Auto Tuner on eBay Rick Frazier Equipment 0 November 27th 04 12:48 AM
FA: J.W.Miller AT-2500 Auto Tuner on eBay Rick Frazier Equipment 0 November 27th 04 12:48 AM
FA: J.W.Miller AT-2500 Auto Tuner on eBay Rick Frazier Equipment 0 November 27th 04 12:48 AM
Wanted- auto ATU for IC706 VK2CJC Equipment 0 April 24th 04 06:31 AM
Auto Ant. Tuner Questions Marvin Rosen Antenna 2 December 29th 03 10:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017