Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #72   Report Post  
Old January 12th 05, 11:31 AM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ian White, G3SEK" wrote in message
...
Reg Edwards wrote:
Ian, theres's far too much unwarranted fuss about ground radials in
ordinary English gardens and back yards. Just lay a few wires, 6 to 12
in number. beneath a trodden-on, compacted soil surface, with lengths
of a few metres, perhaps 5 to 10 metres, and away you go.


Sorry, Reg, you have no way to know how many radials someone else needs.

The 'right' radial layout for any given person will depend on their
available space, their resources, their limitations, their style of
operating (casual, DXing or contesting), and above all their antennas -
none of which you actually know.

For example, in presuming that my next radial installation will be in an
"ordinary English garden", you'd actually be wrong on all three counts!


To everyone else out the if you want to know how many radials you
need, go find out everything you can about radials, from every possible
source. There's lots of it out there. With each bit of information you
find, judge its probable reliability and its relevance to your
particular situation. Then make your own decision.

=============================

Ian, may I suggest you join forces with the Ph.D student on this newsgroup
who wants to develop an explicit formula to "Calculate the Earth resistance
in a Multi-layer Ground Structure". Your problems are not unrelated.

And come back in 20 years time to report your unsuccessful findings. ;o)
----
Reg


  #73   Report Post  
Old January 12th 05, 01:22 PM
Ian White, G3SEK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Reg Edwards wrote:
Ian, may I suggest you join forces with the Ph.D student on this
newsgroup who wants to develop an explicit formula to "Calculate the
Earth resistance in a Multi-layer Ground Structure". Your problems are
not unrelated.

That is strictly his problem. For my purposes, there's already plenty of
information out there.

And come back in 20 years time to report your unsuccessful findings.
;o)


I will come back much sooner, and report some successful DXing... though
you're still going to say it could have been done with a dozen short
radials :-)


--
73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek
  #74   Report Post  
Old January 12th 05, 04:26 PM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I will come back much sooner, and report some successful DXing... though
you're still going to say it could have been done with a dozen short
radials :-)
--
73 from Ian G3SEK

======================

Ian, I wish you a trouble-free shift of abode. There are always stresses
involved which are to looked-back upon with varying degrees of satisfaction.
I envy you and wish I could embark on the same sort of venture.

Don't forget to take with you program RADIALS2 even if you might not have
the luxury of a back yard.
----
Reg.


  #75   Report Post  
Old January 12th 05, 06:58 PM
Ian White, G3SEK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Reg Edwards wrote:

Ian, I wish you a trouble-free shift of abode. There are always
stresses involved which are to looked-back upon with varying degrees of
satisfaction. I envy you and wish I could embark on the same sort of
venture.

Thanks, Reg, that's much appreciated.

But it's only lawyers, estate agents, builders, removal men... what's to
worry about?

Don't forget to take with you program RADIALS2 even if you might not
have
the luxury of a back yard.


It's already on my hard disk.


--
73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek


  #76   Report Post  
Old January 12th 05, 09:53 PM
ZZZPK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jock. wrote:

: On 10 Jan 2005 03:52:38 GMT, Alun wrote:
:
: It's not normally grease, it's vaseline, which is conductive. I don't know
: how vaseline behaves at RF, though. Maybe not too well?
:
: What about silicon grease?
:

ah now Jock.... thats just too technical... next thing you'll be
mentioning which ''number'' of grease which will really confuse them!


  #77   Report Post  
Old January 12th 05, 11:48 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ZZZPK wrote:

Jock. wrote:
: What about silicon grease?

ah now Jock.... thats just too technical... next thing you'll be
mentioning which ''number'' of grease which will really confuse them!


I hear that KY has introduced a heat producing grease.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Resonant and Non-resonant Radials Reg Edwards Antenna 1 January 8th 05 10:27 PM
Performance of a system of Ground Radials Reg Edwards Antenna 1 July 22nd 04 12:32 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
ground radials? Antenna 2 September 10th 03 10:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017