Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Spike" wrote Here in the UK I'll think you'll find the lightning conductors have greased joints. I always thought it was the origin of the term 'greased lightning'.... (only joking) -- from Aero Spike That is funny. But since this has now become rec.batteries.car (just kidding): The reaction from battery acids, air and dirt are minimized with grease. But mechanics who grease the inside of the cable-clamp and outside of the battery post *before the connection is made* are not helping the electrical connection - they're applying preventative maintenance for idiots - who never clean their battery posts. Conductive paste is much more expensive than grease. Those who know what they are doing use the former. Conductive paste is specified in US Lightning protection (NEC-70/NFPA-780), and grease is not allowed to be used in any mechanical connection there. Back to antennas for a moment, we all know that grease (or conductive pate) does not provide waterproofing of any kind. And most of you will accept that grease is a dialectric, not a conductor. But after making a mechanical joint with conductive paste (ensuring no air enters the joint, and conductivity remains per the connected materials), and proper waterproofing is applied, you have a safe and maintenance-free joint that will last for years. Or it would anyway, if the same codes didn't require you to expose and mechanically tighten every such joint once a year. That's why the expensive exothermic (welding) of all grounding electrode conductor joints becomes a savings in the long run. Unfortunately that is never practical along rooflines up on masts and towers. So those mechanical joints must provide as little impedance as possible, and survival of the equipment depends on this. Because all transmitter antenna radials automatically become a part of the lightning protection system, the materials used should be the best you could afford, not the cheapest you can find. And the connections should likewise be the best possible. The transmission system will be more efficient, and safer. Jack Painter Virginia Beach, Virginia |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Resonant and Non-resonant Radials | Antenna | |||
Performance of a system of Ground Radials | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
ground radials? | Antenna |