Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 10th 05, 06:41 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:09:35 +0000, "Ian White, G3SEK"
wrote:
Bottom line: "EIRP" and "RF hazard" don't belong in the same sentence -
except this one.


Hi Ian,

Even more remote is EIRP and nearness (EIRP demands the source appear
to be a point so that all phases from the reflector add to produce the
EIRP).

Another boner is that "a radio telescope is a receive-only device."
This bald statement would consign Arecibo to the ash heap of radio
telescopes because it has a 430 MHz radar system built into it. I
suppose by the same logic, a radar is a receive-only device between
pulses.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017