Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:09:35 +0000, "Ian White, G3SEK"
wrote: Bottom line: "EIRP" and "RF hazard" don't belong in the same sentence - except this one. Hi Ian, Even more remote is EIRP and nearness (EIRP demands the source appear to be a point so that all phases from the reflector add to produce the EIRP). Another boner is that "a radio telescope is a receive-only device." This bald statement would consign Arecibo to the ash heap of radio telescopes because it has a 430 MHz radar system built into it. I suppose by the same logic, a radar is a receive-only device between pulses. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|