This discussion kinda reminds me of a tome I read (and once actually
thought possible), from a CQ article by one "Dr. Shorza Gitchigoomie"
(if i spelled that right), progonosticating on the magnicifiant
effects of negative resistance! Like applying it to light bulbs (they
absorb light)! Or, to electric heaters (air conditioning).
If this indeed would work, then why not - the lower the power- the
higher signal strength! 'Corse this article was published , in APRIL,
about 40 some years ago, and in the intervening years have
discovered that there are some serious flaws in his research!
And I dont expect too much out of Super Conductor Antennas (if they
could work well, would not they be in use at the international space
station, as that temperature must be at least colder than liquid
nitrogen)? or have the laws of Newtonian Physics been repealed?
I await the dawning of the new age! Jim NN7K


Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 01:44:05 GMT, "
wrote:


I would have liked a discussion on the subject


Hi Art,

About superconducting antennas? I've researched patents for a
superconductor think tank in California. Talk about more smoke than
fire.

Unfortunately, a poor choice of phrase, because in a newsgroup, it is
more talk than smoke. errr writing than talking....

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Jim - NN7K wrote:
This discussion kinda reminds me of a tome I read (and once actually
thought possible), from a CQ article by one "Dr. Shorza Gitchigoomie"
(if i spelled that right), progonosticating on the magnicifiant
effects of negative resistance!

Did your read the one about DED's? (Dark Emitting Diodes)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---