Ian Jackson wrote:
It is also 'unlike' in that the link between smoking and lung cancer is
a 100% proven fact (well known since the 1950s) whereas the link between
cellphones and brain tumours is at best tenuous.

That is only a time displacement. In 1900, after hundreds (thousands?)
of years of tobacco use, the link between smoking and lung cancer was
"at best tenuous".
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Ian Jackson wrote:
It is also 'unlike' in that the link between smoking and lung cancer is a
100% proven fact (well known since the 1950s) whereas the link between
cellphones and brain tumours is at best tenuous.

That is only a time displacement. In 1900, after hundreds (thousands?)
of years of tobacco use, the link between smoking and lung cancer was
"at best tenuous".

and at worst...... "Tumor(ous)"

KW

In article , Ian Jackson
writes
In message , Cecil Moore
writes
R. F. Burns wrote:
I'm certainly not too worried because they seem to have too hard of a
time proving anything. Unlike smoking and lung cancer anyway.

How many years was it from the first smoke until the lung cancer link
was suspected? How many years was it from the first cellphone until
brain tumors were suspected? It is unlike only in the amount of time.

It is also 'unlike' in that the link between smoking and lung cancer is
a 100% proven fact (well known since the 1950s) whereas the link
between cellphones and brain tumours is at best tenuous.

Surprisingly, people are suing tobacco companies on the grounds that
'they didn't know' that smoking was bad for you. I suspect that these
are the same type of people who want to ban phone masts, but not the
phones themselves, of course, ie pretty thick!

The are probably also quite happy to have a TV transmitting mast at a
thousand or more times the power.
--
Ian G8ILZ

"Prometheus" wrote in message
...
Surprisingly, people are suing tobacco companies on the grounds that
'they didn't know' that smoking was bad for you. I suspect that these
are the same type of people who want to ban phone masts, but not the
phones themselves, of course, ie pretty thick!

The are probably also quite happy to have a TV transmitting mast at a
thousand or more times the power.

It is a well know fact that RF modulated with naff TV (East Enders, Big
Brother etc) is rendered safe and has no adverse effects (unless you watch
the programmes).

For those with limited technical knowledge of EM radiation (eg at a level
where they believe in heat bands) the above is intended as humour.

--
Brian Reay
www.g8osn.org.uk
www.amateurradiotraining.org.uk
FP#898

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
For those with limited technical knowledge of EM radiation (eg at a level
where they believe in heat bands) the above is intended as humour.