Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
. . . Fact 3. The radiation pattern of a short vertical is fixed and remains independent of the location/height of the loading coil. True for practical purposes. People using antenna modeling programs, or people adept with analytical techniques, will find a small difference in pattern as the loading coil is moved, due to the changed current distribution. But it's an inconsequential difference. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Nosko wrote:
"Play with words if U like." The whole phenomenon is not static. The incident and reflected waves move. It is their interference patterns, the standing waves, which are static. Cecil wisely called them the rms values. I assumed it understood that the RF (a-c) voltages and currents are expressed as their rms values unless otherwise specified. Everyone should know that a-c is an acronym for alternating current which, of course, alternates, Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
An easy experiment with a coil | Antenna | |||
NEWS - Researchers invent antenna for light | Antenna | |||
Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils | Antenna |