| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reg Edwards wrote:
. . . Fact 3. The radiation pattern of a short vertical is fixed and remains independent of the location/height of the loading coil. True for practical purposes. People using antenna modeling programs, or people adept with analytical techniques, will find a small difference in pattern as the loading coil is moved, due to the changed current distribution. But it's an inconsequential difference. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steve Nosko wrote:
"Play with words if U like." The whole phenomenon is not static. The incident and reflected waves move. It is their interference patterns, the standing waves, which are static. Cecil wisely called them the rms values. I assumed it understood that the RF (a-c) voltages and currents are expressed as their rms values unless otherwise specified. Everyone should know that a-c is an acronym for alternating current which, of course, alternates, Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| An easy experiment with a coil | Antenna | |||
| NEWS - Researchers invent antenna for light | Antenna | |||
| Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils | Antenna | |||