| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
W5DXP wrote:
There is forward current flowing into the bottom of the coil and out the top. There is reflected current flowing into the top of the coil and out the bottom. The net current is a standing current wave. In view of the above, for practical putposes, trying to get maximum performance out of the loaded radiator, it should be beneficial to have the same diameter of whip above the coil, rather than tapering whip? One might deduct that if the current is diminishing towards the top, that the diameter of the radiator (RF resistance) could be tapered also. But since the RF current has to flow to the tip and then reflect and go back and interfere with itself, we should make it uniform, where possible. We are probably talking about fraction of a peanut, but for the purists and sake of argument. Yuri, K3BU.us |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| An easy experiment with a coil | Antenna | |||
| NEWS - Researchers invent antenna for light | Antenna | |||
| Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils | Antenna | |||