Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the rod does anything at all, it increases the effective length of
the antenna. You can accomplish the same thing by physically increasing the wire length. And all that will do is to increase the amount of signal -- and noise -- entering your receiver. Once you have enough signal and noise to overcome your receiver's internal noise, there's no advantage of any further increase, since there's no improvement in the signal to noise ratio. Try disconnecting your antenna from your radio. If the noise level drops when you do, you've got adequate signal strength from the antenna, and lengthening it -- either physically or with some kind of loading -- won't help you hear signals. The explanation of the properties of the antenna at the distributor's web site is wholly hype and sales marketing. It's a mismash of misused technical terms, which means nothing and and is quite apparently intended to mislead a potential customer and present the antenna as having wonderful properties which it doesn't in fact have. I'd avoid buying it for that reason if for none other. Roy Lewallen, W7EL RHF wrote: FO&A, Here is my Question: Is there any sense in putting a Ferrite Rod at the Far-End of a Random Wire Antenna with the Wire from the End of the Wire Antenna Element 'wrapped' around it in a "Tuned Coil" to improve the AM/MW Band Reception ? * Any 'theory' behind why this Idea might Work ? * Does this Idea actually Work ? * Or is this Idea just so much Antenna 'hype' and Sales Marketing I am Asking these Questions is because of what I have read about the RF Systems "EMF" Electro-Magnetic-Field Passive Wire Antenna http://www.universal-radio.com/catalog/sw_ant/0743.html In "John Wagner's Shortwave Tips & Tricks" he writes: http://www.dxing.com/tips.htm "The EMF antenna has two 35mm film canister looking objects connected to it. The canister on the Far-End is actually an excellent "Tuned Ferrite Rod" designed for MW (Medium Wave) and really helps any receiver without a built in MW Antenna Rod. Canister two (in middle) is a Balun that helps SW reception very much." i want to know ~ RHF . . |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roy Lewallen" wrote
Once you have enough signal and noise to overcome your receiver's internal noise, there's no advantage of any further increase, since there's no improvement in the signal to noise ratio. __________________ Pardon the thread drift, but making the receive antenna directional can improve system SNR by reducing the total noise voltage delivered to the receiver input, as a ratio of the desired signal. RF |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes. My response was intentionally simplified. Making a directional
antenna is often not a viable option for an SWL, because they typically operate over a wide frequency range, and want to receive signals from many directions. This pretty much limits them to something like a rotatable log periodic antenna. Wire antennas can be made directional, but typically only in fixed or a small number of directions, and with directional patterns that change with frequency. Within the range of discussion, then, I don't believe it's realistic to attempt a directional antenna. The advertised antenna certainly doesn't produce any advantage in this regard. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Richard Fry wrote: "Roy Lewallen" wrote Once you have enough signal and noise to overcome your receiver's internal noise, there's no advantage of any further increase, since there's no improvement in the signal to noise ratio. __________________ Pardon the thread drift, but making the receive antenna directional can improve system SNR by reducing the total noise voltage delivered to the receiver input, as a ratio of the desired signal. RF |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank You One and All for your Replies.
Well I have the two Inverted "L" Antennas and the proof would be in the Doing by de-rigging one and wrapping the Antenna Wire around a Ferrite Core; so that the Coil will be at the Top of Vertical Up-Leg. Then doing some Side-by-Side Testing of the two Antennas. NOTE: Taking a second look at the RF Systems "EMF" Antenna. The more I get the impression that it is susposed to be Rigged as a Vertical using the Coax Cable as a Counterpoise or may be as an Inverted "L" with the Coax Cable as the Vertical Up-Leg and the Antenna as the Horizontal Out-Arm. once again thank you very much one and all ~ RHF .. .. = = = Conan Ford wrote in message = = = .159... (RHF) wrote in om: FO&A, Here is my Question: Is there any sense in putting a Ferrite Rod at the Far-End of a Random Wire Antenna with the Wire from the End of the Wire Antenna Element 'wrapped' around it in a "Tuned Coil" to improve the AM/MW Band Reception ? * Any 'theory' behind why this Idea might Work ? * Does this Idea actually Work ? * Or is this Idea just so much Antenna 'hype' and Sales Marketing I am Asking these Questions is because of what I have read about the RF Systems "EMF" Electro-Magnetic-Field Passive Wire Antenna http://www.universal-radio.com/catalog/sw_ant/0743.html In "John Wagner's Shortwave Tips & Tricks" he writes: http://www.dxing.com/tips.htm "The EMF antenna has two 35mm film canister looking objects connected to it. The canister on the Far-End is actually an excellent "Tuned Ferrite Rod" designed for MW (Medium Wave) and really helps any receiver without a built in MW Antenna Rod. Canister two (in middle) is a Balun that helps SW reception very much." i want to know ~ RHF . . I have a 20 foot straight wire in my garage, that works better for MW DXing than the ferrite rods in any radio I have, due to the fact that it is much further from any noise sources in the house. I imagine the 16 foot wire being sold there would pick up some MW, but I doubt that adding the ferrite bar at the end helps one bit. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Random length wire antenna | Antenna | |||
Long wire antenna | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |