LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19   Report Post  
Old December 8th 04, 09:18 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 20:55:18 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote:

and if that isn't enough, to further complicate matters, the
internal impedance of the transmitter changes as the load impedance is
varied


Hi Reggie,

Such arguments are as juvenile as the claim no one can travel a
straight line because the earth is rotating under them. A quadrillion
miles of experience would suggest this too is trivial to accomplish.

Aren't you the one who is so charmed with the legacy of Kelvinator who
chimed that such chimera without calculation are the chatter of chimps
in the forest canopy?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement Yuri Blanarovich Antenna 69 December 5th 03 02:11 PM
Complex line Z0: A numerical example Roy Lewallen Antenna 11 September 13th 03 01:04 AM
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 10:06 PM
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) Dr. Slick Antenna 98 August 30th 03 03:09 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017