LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14   Report Post  
Old October 25th 18, 09:18 AM posted to uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Feb 2014
Posts: 180
Default 4NEC2?

On 25/10/2018 07:06, Jeff wrote:

Jeff's problems began when his nuclear-weapons handbook didn't appear to
explain what the purpose was of the test under discussion. As a result
he limited himself to EMP in a test that used a weapon that wasn't
designed to produce it, and which was in fact being tested for different
effects[1] so had to have this explained to him. Anyway this is all far
above any pay grade you ever held so I would not have expected you to
understand the difference, either then or now, but it was generous of
you to remind us all once more of your shortcomings.


[1] Jeff wrote "The Russian K program was there to investigate EMP just
as were the
Starfish and Fish-bowl US programmes, They were high altitude tests and
produced no ground effects other than EMP, not good for blowing thing up
on the ground", which of course ignores what the K tests were actually
designed to test - which wasn't EMP.


You were trying to deflect the argument, which was that low level bursts
do no produce wide area EMP. To do that requires a high altitude burst,
in the region of 50km +, which is outside the capabilities of most
terrorist groups, which was what was bing discussed (although looking at
the behaviour of some states these days the definition might be a little
fudged).


IIRC that's what Reay has claimed as well, but his first contribution to
the thread was an attack on Cummins, one of several of his in that
thread. Note that the Trinity test in 1945 had screened/hardened test
equipment because of the EMP threat, and some of it failed due to the
EMP. In any case Gareth's original post that started the thread makes no
mention of the burst height, so there was nothing to 'fudge', as you put
it, although it should be noted that you did say "Low altitude or ground
level bursts produce little in the way of EMP, this is due to the
mechanism that produces the pulse which requires a
large mean free path between electrons in the atmosphere that only
exists at very high altitudes.". 'Little' does not equal 'none', as they
found out at Alamogordo.


--
Spike

"Nearly all men can stand adversity,
but if you want to test a man's character,
give him an internet group to manage"

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
a little 4nec2 help? [email protected] Antenna 5 November 13th 07 06:04 AM
Anybody tried 4nec2 on Vista ? 4nec2 Antenna 8 July 8th 07 04:06 AM
New 4nec2 version Arie Antenna 15 February 19th 06 05:42 AM
4nec2 and linux ?? dansawyeror Antenna 6 February 7th 06 02:52 PM
4nec2 question larry d clark Antenna 1 March 12th 04 01:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017