Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 21st 04, 02:23 PM
PDRUNEN
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why Match ?

Hi All,

I was reviewing a 75 to 50 ohm resistive matching network using two resistors,
the insertion lost was 5.7 db.

If we have a 100Vrms source with 50 ohm source impedance and it is driving a
matched 50 ohm load then the load takes 1A and the power in the load is 50
watts.

If the load is replaced with 75 ohm, then 0.8 amps will flow and the power is
48 watts. (I*I*R) == (0.8)*(0.8)*75.

I guess I must be not be taking something in account, but 2 watts does not
equal 5.7 db.

I know there must be a good reason to put the matching pad in line for the
sprectrum analyizer but I don't under why.

Thanks,

de KJ4UO
  #2   Report Post  
Old December 21st 04, 04:30 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 21 Dec 2004 14:23:10 GMT, (PDRUNEN) wrote:

Hi All,

I was reviewing a 75 to 50 ohm resistive matching network using two resistors,
the insertion lost was 5.7 db.


Hi OM,

That is the loss for using the network, and for this network it
appears to be Power lost IN the network (rather than Power not
delivered to the Load). However, this is not the best design for a
matching network, they are usually three resistors in either a PI or T
configuration.

If we have a 100Vrms source with 50 ohm source impedance and it is driving a
matched 50 ohm load then the load takes 1A and the power in the load is 50
watts.


No matching network is required for this scenario.

If the load is replaced with 75 ohm, then 0.8 amps will flow and the power is
48 watts. (I*I*R) == (0.8)*(0.8)*75.


By your description, you are still not using the matching network. If
you think you are, then the math is incorrect.

I guess I must be not be taking something in account, but 2 watts does not
equal 5.7 db.


Of course not. You never accounted for your two matching resistors so
you cannot assign the 5.7dB loss to them.

I know there must be a good reason to put the matching pad in line for the
sprectrum analyizer but I don't under why.


There are any number of reasons - accuracy and stability being
principal among them. On the other hand, the two resistor variety is
not the most suitable for accuracy (except under known loads).
Another virtue is that it will increase the input power specification
by that same 5.7dB. This very handy when you are putting a flame
thrower to its input. Burnt resistors are cheaper and easier to
replace than the input stage. One very useful 100 Ohm resistor is a
10mA glass fuse (Wollaston wire).

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #4   Report Post  
Old December 21st 04, 09:20 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:27:54 +0000, Ian Jackson
wrote:

However, this is not the best design for a
matching network, they are usually three resistors in either a PI or T
configuration.

Several manufacturers of precision matching pads might disagree!


Hi Ian,

I seriously doubt it, but you are free to offer examples.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #5   Report Post  
Old December 21st 04, 10:51 PM
Ian Jackson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , Richard Clark
writes
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:27:54 +0000, Ian Jackson
wrote:

However, this is not the best design for a
matching network, they are usually three resistors in either a PI or T
configuration.

Several manufacturers of precision matching pads might disagree!


Hi Ian,

I seriously doubt it, but you are free to offer examples.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC




http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes.cfm...mber/972/ln/en
http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes.cfm...te_number/3250
http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes.cfm...mber/972/ln/en
http://www.testmart.com/estore/produ...Fsearch%2Fspec.
cfm~~MICCOM~~AGILEN~~11852B~~%20~~%20|1.html
http://www.g4fgq.regp.btinternet.co.uk/padmatch.pas
http://www.g4fgq.regp.btinternet.co.uk/padmatch.pas
http://used-line.com/b2544p1pr0-Used-pads.htm
http://www.minicircuits.com/dg03-159.pdf#search='minimum%20loss%20pad'
+ many, many more!
Ian.

--



  #6   Report Post  
Old December 21st 04, 11:25 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:51:30 +0000, Ian Jackson
wrote:

In message , Richard Clark
writes
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:27:54 +0000, Ian Jackson
wrote:

However, this is not the best design for a
matching network, they are usually three resistors in either a PI or T
configuration.
Several manufacturers of precision matching pads might disagree!


Hi Ian,

I seriously doubt it, but you are free to offer examples.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

+ many, many more!
Ian.


Hi Ian,

Perhaps you can share from those many, many more, those which
disagree?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #7   Report Post  
Old December 21st 04, 04:39 PM
W9DMK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 21 Dec 2004 14:23:10 GMT, (PDRUNEN) wrote:

Hi All,

I was reviewing a 75 to 50 ohm resistive matching network using two resistors,
the insertion lost was 5.7 db.

If we have a 100Vrms source with 50 ohm source impedance and it is driving a
matched 50 ohm load then the load takes 1A and the power in the load is 50
watts.


This is correct, if the 100 V rms source is the Thevenin emf - not the
loaded terminal voltage.

If the load is replaced with 75 ohm, then 0.8 amps will flow and the power is
48 watts. (I*I*R) == (0.8)*(0.8)*75.


Under those condx the load voltage is 60 V rms and the load power is
48 watts, as you indicated.

I guess I must be not be taking something in account, but 2 watts does not
equal 5.7 db.


Since the original load voltage was 50 volts rms and now it's 60
volts, one could argue that the load voltage is up by 1.6 dB. However,
the load power at 48 watts is in fact down by 0.17 dB


I know there must be a good reason to put the matching pad in line for the
sprectrum analyizer but I don't under why.


Interestingly enough, none of this has anything to do with your L-pad
matching network. All of your calculations above relate only to the
hypothetical situation in which you are actually "changing" the load
resistance and computing the new load power - nothing whatsoever to do
with the situation you would have when you actually insert an L-pad
between the real source and the original 50 ohm load.

A 75 to 50 ohm resistive matching pad is designed to work with a 75
ohm load and to present a 50 ohm load to the source, which it will do.
When you calculate the amount of power in the 75 ohm load before and
after inserting the L-pad you will get a significant loss, depending
upon the exact design of the two-resistor network. 5.7 dB sounds a bit
high, but it depends upon how the L-Pad losses are defined.

As to the reason for using the L-Pad, it's probably for the purpose of
minimizing the SWR on the cable between the L-Pad/Load and the source.
Since you haven't specified anything about the source, the load or
what the purpose of the circuit is, one can only guess.



Bob, W9DMK, Dahlgren, VA
http://www.qsl.net/w9dmk
  #8   Report Post  
Old December 21st 04, 05:00 PM
Ralph Mowery
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I was reviewing a 75 to 50 ohm resistive matching network using two
resistors,
the insertion lost was 5.7 db.

If we have a 100Vrms source with 50 ohm source impedance and it is driving

a
matched 50 ohm load then the load takes 1A and the power in the load is 50
watts.

If the load is replaced with 75 ohm, then 0.8 amps will flow and the power

is
48 watts. (I*I*R) == (0.8)*(0.8)*75.

I guess I must be not be taking something in account, but 2 watts does not
equal 5.7 db.

I know there must be a good reason to put the matching pad in line for the
sprectrum analyizer but I don't under why.

Thanks,

de KJ4UO


In test devices the losses are not usually a problem as long as the levels
are accounted for if absolute numbers are needed. The impedances must match
if any tuning is done. As teh impedance of a receiver is not usaully 50
ohms over a wide frequency range , you use a 6 db pad or so to isolate the
generator from the receiver . If tuned circuits are involved, the impedance
missmatch (swr) can cause many problems . You tune a device for a 50 ohm
source or load and then replace it with a 70 ohm device and the tuning will
usually change . By using the pads, it is an attempt to keep the impedance
changes at a minimum when the test instruments are removed and the device
put back into normal operation.


  #10   Report Post  
Old December 21st 04, 06:52 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

PDRUNEN wrote:
Hi All,

I was reviewing a 75 to 50 ohm resistive matching network using two resistors,
the insertion lost was 5.7 db.

If we have a 100Vrms source with 50 ohm source impedance and it is driving a
matched 50 ohm load then the load takes 1A and the power in the load is 50
watts.

If the load is replaced with 75 ohm, then 0.8 amps will flow and the power is
48 watts. (I*I*R) == (0.8)*(0.8)*75.

I guess I must be not be taking something in account, but 2 watts does not
equal 5.7 db.


It appears that you forgot to put the resistive matching network
into the circuit. There must be a series resistor in there between
the source impedance and the load impedance to obtain that 5.7 dB
of isolation.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


-----------== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----= Over 100,000 Newsgroups - Unlimited Fast Downloads - 19 Servers =-----


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
please need help with delta loop antenna better matching system than gamma match Silvio Antenna 4 November 15th 04 08:42 PM
Clemens match modelling Brian Howie Antenna 2 September 19th 04 08:54 AM
Problem with Gamma Match? Jason Dugas Antenna 1 August 13th 04 03:22 AM
Gamma match question 6-meter yagi Shadow 998 Antenna 9 June 22nd 04 02:05 AM
Gamma match: Inherently inferior to balanced match systems? Cecil Moore Antenna 5 September 24th 03 04:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017