Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob, KB8TL wrote:
"Anyone have any thoughts on why this might not work?" I`ve worked in several medium wave broadcast stations which used buried coax to feed the towers. No problems.. I worked in a shortwave broadcast plant where we needed a 100 KW dummy load. So we constructed a parallel wire 600-ohm line only about 2 feet above the earth using Copperweld wires a few hundred feet long. It could boil the dew on the groud and bring earth worms to the surface. It also did a great job of dissipating the 100 KW. Anytime parallel line such as twinlead or ladderline approaches ordinary earth, loss soars. Direct burial is impractical even inside fairly large conduit. Use one or two lengths of waterproof coax as buried line. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Could you not create low loss "coax" by using concentric pipes? Might be easier than all this hacking around.. That, or run heliax in the buried section, and convert to balanced in a little box on the other end. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave VanHorn" wrote in message ... Could you not create low loss "coax" by using concentric pipes? Might be easier than all this hacking around.. They call that hard line, as in Heliax etc. W4OP |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And I thought it were only Black pudding that came from Bury...
|
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Anytime parallel line such as twinlead or ladderline approaches ordinary earth, loss soars. Direct burial is impractical even inside fairly large conduit. Use one or two lengths of waterproof coax as buried line. A ham I know uses parallel runs of buried RG62 as a compromise. That gives him a characteristic impedance of 186 ohms for his 30 foot underground section. It was interesting to model that setup using MicroSmith. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"A ham I knpe uses parallel runs of RG 62 as a compromise. That gives him a characteristic impedance of 186 ohms for his 30 foot underground section." Yes. It`s balanced to ground and has twice the characteristic impedance of a single run of coax. In the case of twin runs of RG 82, that is twice a value of 93 ohms, or 186 ohms, center conductor to center conductor. I recall analog microwave radios which had their baseband signals wired with twin runs for each direction of transmission like that to obtain a shielded and balanced baseband system. It must have been good for the coax business and it made for a quiet radio too. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Additional Line Losses Due to SWR | Antenna | |||
Question running balanced line | Antenna | |||
MFJ-974H Balanced Line Tuner | Antenna | |||
Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna |