LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
Old January 1st 05, 05:08 PM
Ian White, G3SEK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Stephen Tompsett wrote:
Kristinn Andersen, TF3KX wrote:
Hi - I am looking for an impedance analyzer. Primarily for antenna
measurements (only 1,8-30 MHz) and secondarily for misc. lab
measurements (L,C,Q measurements, signal generation, etc.). The
possibilities I have been looking at are (in no particular order,
prices approximate):
a) MFJ-259B ($300)
b) MFJ-269 ($220)
c) AEA VIA ($600)
d) Autek VA1 ($200)
d) Micro908 kit from AmQRP ($210)
e) N2PK Vector Network Analyzer project ($150)
At first glance I have the following points/questions:
- Does MFJ-269 offer anything over 259B in addition to VHF/UHF?
- W8WWV tests (web) don't indicate that AEA VIA performs better than
the MFJs.
- Micro908 is new. Any experiences, comments on impedance accuracy?
- N2PK may be the most accurate(?) but needs a PC and involved
construction.
- Any comments on the Autek?
All suggestions are appreciated, based on experience and technical
quality.
73s de Kristinn, TF3KX


I have used three of these

MFJ-259B - OK while it was working, but it has failed twice. I do
not recommend!
Autek VA1 - Nice - but fiddley to use build quality not good
eats batteries!
AEA VIA - Very nice, the display makes on-site adjustments and checks
easy, ability to store and transfer data to a PC is useful
Solid build - won't run off NICAD/NIMH - it needs 12V!
N.B. I find the third party PC software better than the
official AEA software


At the time I attempted to review the AEA-CIA a few years ago, my worry
was with the built-in firmware, which produced weird results in R-X mode
(like, physically impossible).


The difference between the "amateur" and "professional" leagues for
impedance measurement is that the professional Vector Network Analysers
use a calibration procedure to compensate for their own internal errors.
This boosts the measurement accuracy into a completely different league.

Of all the ones mentioned, only the N2PK and the TAPR designs can do
this. All the others really are playing in the amateur league.


--
73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
mobile antenna impedance comparison H. Adam Stevens, NQ5H Antenna 23 January 22nd 04 10:32 AM
Mobile Ant L match ? Henry Kolesnik Antenna 14 January 20th 04 04:08 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 29th 03 11:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017