Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am trying to get the best performance from my Ten Tec RX-320 when it
is connected to my shack's QRP 40M extended double zepp (176 ft overall, fed with 300 ohm twinlead). Performance on HF improved when I inserted an LDG 4:1 balun. I substituted a $3 TV balun (300/75) and the improvment remained. However, I noticed that VLF/LF -- for which my radio has the AMRAD mod -- has gone more or less deaf. I can't even hear Loran on 100 kHz; without the balun it was 59. BCB -- already attenuated with an I.C.E. BCB filter but also 59 -- has also gotten worse. Why would a balun made for high frequency impede low frequency (i.e. below 1.5 kHz)? Ken KC2JDY Ken (to reply via email remove "zz" from address) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
88 ft + 66 ft fanned doublet? | Antenna | |||
88 ft. Doublet Question | Antenna | |||
G5RV or 135 foot doublet or Carolina Windom? | Antenna | |||
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
Feeding a doublet | Antenna |