| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
thank you for responding, well, chaning the impedance, you mentioned i thought would be important, as also i'd like to not have my 'shield' flowing w/rf i've been told it might help reduce 'interference' not sure however i fail to see how my ability or inablity to explain something equates to 'needing' a particular part or not, hence why i want to learn if i knew, all the ''angles' and aspects i wouldn't post i am still missing the info i seek In article , (Robert Lay) wrote: On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 11:37:25 GMT, ml wrote: hi i've build a 80 center fed dipole, cut for 80, to use multiband-- fed via coax. my goal is to use a balun. my recomendations so far have been for 1:1 /4:1 and 9:1, got nearly a equal tally of votes on each leaves me a bit confused however lets say i use a 9:1 for example on 80 my dipole is resonant, therefore should be around 72ohms. lets presume it is now w/a 9:1 attached what happens? is this my trade off, ie i become very ineff at resonance while gaining some better match at the non resonant points? Permit me to ask a simple question. Aside from the transformation of the impedance, what benefit were you planning to obtain from the Balun? If you can't answer that question, then perhaps you don't really need a Balun. Another question, if you don't mind. Are you familiar with Choke Baluns or the W2DU Balun? Bob, W9DMK, Dahlgren, VA http://www.qsl.net/w9dmk |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Parallel balun problem with wire loop | Antenna | |||
| Adding a 2:1 balun to a multi-band dipole | Antenna | |||
| Horizontal loop - balun or no balun ? | Antenna | |||
| Balun Grounding Question ? | Antenna | |||
| Bricks effect in dipole resonance? Help! | Antenna | |||