Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:33:53 -0700, W5DXP
wrote: Richard Clark wrote: But, again, this discussion is generally reserved only for those interested in accuracy. :-) Like I say, my solution is to block any reflections from being incident upon the source. But I have a question. Since we are discussing coherent sine waves, it seems to me that any reflection from the source impedance will become indistinguishable from the generated wave. In fact, the present convention of generated power equals forward power minus reflected power is designed to overcome that very problem. Hi Cecil, So you DO want to perform this test? Your presumption of coherency is false unless you engineer the solution. I got there first and made sure that wasn't gonna happen. :-) Any random attempt has only a one in 360 chance of being correct within one degree of coherent. This is simple interference math after all. Most individuals would just notice a 10 degree error which would boost your chances to slightly less than 3% - not very good coherency wise. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna | |||
Mother Nature's reflection coefficient... | Antenna |