Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tarmo Tammaru wrote:
The output rose to the open circuit value. Assuming you are talking about voltage, for a Norton equivalent, that's a very lossy situation. What was your source? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Tarmo Tammaru wrote: The output rose to the open circuit value. Assuming you are talking about voltage, for a Norton equivalent, that's a very lossy situation. What was your source? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp The source was an MFJ269, and as I mentioned, the external series resistor was 75 Ohms. I should try it with something like 1K. Coax was ~100 feet of 9913. My scope is only good to 100 MHz; so, I have to keep the frequency down. BTW, I have met Ed Norton. Tam/WB2TT |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna | |||
Mother Nature's reflection coefficient... | Antenna |