LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
Old September 2nd 03, 06:02 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cecil Moore wrote:
Using deductive reasoning, since the real part of the voltage
reflection coefficient cannot be greater than 1.0, ...


So much for my deductive reasoning - A kind soul has furnished proof
by email that the real part of the voltage reflection can be greater
than 1.0.

Z_0 = 50 - 25j (which is well within the - 45 to 45 degree angle bounds)
Z_L = 50 + 250j (chosen to make the arithmetic easy; there are lots more)

Then Z_L - Z_0 = 275j and Z_L + Z_0 = 100 + 225j so that
gamma = 11j/(4 + 9j) = 11j(4 - 9j)/(16 + 81) = (99 + 44j)/97.

--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Complex line Z0: A numerical example Roy Lewallen Antenna 11 September 13th 03 01:04 AM
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 10:06 PM
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit Dr. Slick Antenna 126 September 10th 03 04:26 PM
Complex Z0 pez Antenna 0 August 31st 03 11:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017