| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
September 4th 03, 12:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Reg Edwards wrote:
Your only avenue of escape is to prove the | rho | meter gives incorrect meter readings. Nope, your only avenue of escape is to prove that a passive load can reflect more than the incident power. :-) By the way, does that Texas vinyard you mentioned have a website? ;o) I don't know but I will check. Heck, I might even try a bottle to see if it's worth sending to you. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit) | Antenna | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
| Mother Nature's reflection coefficient... | Antenna | |||
Threaded Mode
