Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient?

#10

September 4th 03, 12:33 AM

Cecil Moore

Posts: n/a

Roy Lewallen wrote:
I'll now bow out, unless a coherent alternative analysis, or specific
corrections to the one I posted, are presented.

Heh, heh, just discovered how wrong you are, eh? :-) It was an
easy mistake to make, Roy.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit)	David or Jo Anne Ryeburn	Antenna	17	December 13th 03 10:48 AM
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know)	Dr. Slick	Antenna	199	September 12th 03 10:06 PM
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit	Dr. Slick	Antenna	126	September 10th 03 04:26 PM
Mother Nature's reflection coefficient...	Peter O. Brackett	Antenna	8	August 28th 03 06:17 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:29 AM.

Menu

About Us