Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 4th 03, 10:21 PM
David Robbins
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
What all you experts have forgotten is that SWR on a
lossless line is the ratio of two voltages, max and
min, SPACED APART BY 1/4-WAVELENGTH. That is if the
line is long enough to contain both a max and a min.

When the line is not lossless, ie., it has appreciable
attenuation in dB per 1/4-wavelength, then the ratio is
'distorted' and has a phase angle. So negative values
of indicated SWR can be expected at some values of |
Vmax | / | Vmin |

SWR is calculated from the square of | rho |. As


VSWR is defined as |Vmax|/|Vmin| and so can never be negative. in lossless
lines this expression can be reduced to a function of rho, but that method
is not valid in lossy lines. VSWR is not a constant in lossy lines and
probably doesn't really mean much of anything as each voltage maximum and
minimum is a different value, so which ones do you use???


  #2   Report Post  
Old September 5th 03, 12:06 AM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

VSWR is not a constant in lossy lines and
probably doesn't really mean much of anything as each

voltage maximum and
minimum is a different value, so which ones do you

use???

-------------------------------------------------------
---------

Dear David,

You have expressed my sentiments exactly. I have never
used either or any of them. What does anybody do with
value of SWR when they imagine they know it? I'm
pleased to make your acquaintance!

For some years I have mildly advertised the idea of
changing the name the name of the common-or-garden, so
called SWR meter / combined forward-and-reflected power
meter, to the TLI (Transmitter Loading Indicator) which
is all it does. Although I must admit, at the present
state of the art, it is a very useful instrument when
changing antennas.

Is the transmitter loaded with a resistance of 50 ohms
or is it not?

{ Actually, the meter on my top-band transmitter
indicates relative to 75 ohms }

And there HAS to be SOMETHING more than the weather to
talk about in QSO's and, of course, on this newsgroup.
;o)
----
Reg, G4FGQ


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit) David or Jo Anne Ryeburn Antenna 17 December 13th 03 11:48 AM
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 11:06 PM
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit Dr. Slick Antenna 126 September 10th 03 05:26 PM
Mother Nature's reflection coefficient... Peter O. Brackett Antenna 8 August 28th 03 07:17 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017