Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 15:50:26 -0700, "Caveat Lector"
wrote: Main reason is that the diode detector types of VSWR Meters are very inaccurate when any VSWR is present Also I have found that running PA's at 90% gives a much cleaner output (Usually) so I need a meter that will give reasonable accuracy when making these adjustments. Some cheapo VHF VSWR meters are so inaccurate as to be useless. For Bird -- buy the appropriate slug -- slugs are very inexpensive on the used market. Not E-BAy -- hi hi And Mil Surplus thru line meters are very cheap on the surplus market, Less than new diode detector types. Hi OM, Art says why buy expensive equipment, and then extols a scope (easily three to ten times expensive as a new Bird 43). He probably intends to only measure flat power with perfect sine shape applied to perfect designs. A CB SWR meter works better with even the slightest hint of imperfection and just as well when every thing is hunky-dory. If you want to watch a phosphor glow, get TV or build your meter with a Magic Eye tube (more range than LEDs suggested elsewhere). You say diode detector types of VSWR Meters are very inaccurate when any VSWR is present and then extol the Bird or Mil Surplus - which are diode detector types (what aren't - scopes? WHOOPZ back into that yarn). Has anyone here actually measured SWR without using a diode? Form a que here and tell your story. I want to hear the one about your single device non-linear detector (a way of not saying diode while still being a diode). Caveat Reader, Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How a Bird works | Antenna | |||
Cecil's Math a Blunder? | Antenna |