RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   Virus/Worm email messages (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/462-virus-worm-email-messages.html)

Cecil Moore September 20th 03 06:57 PM

Virus/Worm email messages
 
Is anyone else being deluged with Virus/Worm email messages?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Steve September 20th 03 07:23 PM


"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Is anyone else being deluged with Virus/Worm email messages?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

Yes, 14 yesterday and 4 so far this morning.

73, Steve
WB6RIB



David Robbins September 20th 03 07:42 PM


"Steve" wrote in message
m...

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Is anyone else being deluged with Virus/Worm email messages?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

Yes, 14 yesterday and 4 so far this morning.


you must not have many friends who have you in their address book... i got
about 1000 overnight last night and about 2500 the day before.



Dee D. Flint September 20th 03 07:54 PM


"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Is anyone else being deluged with Virus/Worm email messages?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


Yes over 600 in the last 3 or 4 days.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Reg Edwards September 20th 03 08:01 PM

Is anyone else being deluged with Virus/Worm email messages?
--

================================

Me too - 2000 per day.

Terrorist attack or just another up-and-coming Bill Gates?

G4FGQ, UK




David Robbins September 20th 03 08:07 PM


"J. McLaughlin" wrote in message
...
YES. MB worth. So many that E-mail drive was filled on Friday. Just
received five in a five minute period.
Not hard to trap, however they are quite a pain. Have yet to get
ISP to block them.
Good luck. Mac N8TT


my isp is stopping the infected ones, which appears to be most of them.. its
funny though, some get through with an empty attachment. there must be a
bug in the virus that occasionally attaches an empty file instead of itself.



Walter Maxwell September 20th 03 08:21 PM

On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 19:01:51 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote:

Is anyone else being deluged with Virus/Worm email messages?
--

================================

Me too - 2000 per day.

Terrorist attack or just another up-and-coming Bill Gates?

G4FGQ, UK


Me too, 49 yesterday and 80 today.

Walt, W2DU

Dee D. Flint September 20th 03 08:35 PM


"David Robbins" wrote in message
...

"J. McLaughlin" wrote in message
...
YES. MB worth. So many that E-mail drive was filled on Friday. Just
received five in a five minute period.
Not hard to trap, however they are quite a pain. Have yet to get
ISP to block them.
Good luck. Mac N8TT


my isp is stopping the infected ones, which appears to be most of them..

its
funny though, some get through with an empty attachment. there must be a
bug in the virus that occasionally attaches an empty file instead of

itself.


Actually my ISP is blocking the actual virus/worms but then the message
itself gets passed on to me with a statement from the ISP that if I want the
file to contact the sender and arrange another means of getting it.
However, that still is a huge number of emails in my box.

I've tried to trap them but the headers and senders, etc are all different.
If you have a suggestion on how to stop them, please let us all in on it.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


David Robbins September 20th 03 08:45 PM


"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
. com...

"David Robbins" wrote in message
...

"J. McLaughlin" wrote in message
...
YES. MB worth. So many that E-mail drive was filled on Friday.

Just
received five in a five minute period.
Not hard to trap, however they are quite a pain. Have yet to get
ISP to block them.
Good luck. Mac N8TT


my isp is stopping the infected ones, which appears to be most of them..

its
funny though, some get through with an empty attachment. there must be

a
bug in the virus that occasionally attaches an empty file instead of

itself.


Actually my ISP is blocking the actual virus/worms but then the message
itself gets passed on to me with a statement from the ISP that if I want

the
file to contact the sender and arrange another means of getting it.
However, that still is a huge number of emails in my box.

I've tried to trap them but the headers and senders, etc are all

different.
If you have a suggestion on how to stop them, please let us all in on it.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


if you can filter by the text in the body use "September 2003, Cumulative
Patch" that should be unique enough to catch them without taking out other
messages. the isp messages should be easy to filter out, i use the phrases
"virus found in received message" and "problem found in received message" to
send them to the deleted folder.



Irv Finkleman September 20th 03 09:21 PM

Cecil Moore wrote:

Is anyone else being deluged with Virus/Worm email messages?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----


You are not alone! We are not alone! You can learn a bit about
it -- just hit google with 'swen virus' as a search term and look'
at any of the antivirus sites such as Symantec. It may take a while
before this one dies down!
--
--------------------------------------
Diagnosed Type II Diabetes March 5 2001
Beating it with diet and exercise!
297/215/210 (to be revised lower)
58"/43"(!)/44" (already lower too!)
--------------------------------------
Visit my HomePage at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv/
Visit my very special website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv4/
Visit my CFSRS/CFIOG ONLINE OLDTIMERS website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv5/
--------------------
Irv Finkleman,
Grampa/Ex-Navy/Old Fart/Ham Radio VE6BP
Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Ed Price September 20th 03 09:36 PM

There is a major net attack in progress. The Swen worm can bug even
well-protected computers, since the payload arrives as a 106 kB email
attachment. If your mailbox has a 10 MB capacity, then all you need is 90+,
and you admin will automatically start bouncing ALL your incoming mail. In
effect, a Denial of Service fringe benefit for the worm.

In addition to trying to look like an official MS announcement, the worm is
also arriving in the form of a fake notice of undeliverable email. Don't
investigate ANY attachments unless you want to live very dangerously.

Ed
WB6WSN


"J. McLaughlin" wrote in message
...
YES. MB worth. So many that E-mail drive was filled on Friday. Just
received five in a five minute period.
Not hard to trap, however they are quite a pain. Have yet to get
ISP to block them.
Good luck. Mac N8TT

--
J. Mc Laughlin - Michigan USA
Home:

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Is anyone else being deluged with Virus/Worm email messages?
--
73, Cecil
http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp






David or Jo Anne Ryeburn September 20th 03 09:37 PM

In article , "Dee D.
Flint" wrote:

I've tried to trap them but the headers and senders, etc are all different.


The "From:" lines are likely forged. Many such worms and viruses pick
recipients and purported senders randomly from the infected computer's
Outlook or Outlook Express address list. If you want to see where the
message really is coming from, examine full headers carefully --
specifically, the "Received: from" lines.

If you have a suggestion on how to stop them, please let us all in on it.


Persuade the universe to cease using unsafe operating system software,
browsers, and e-mail programs coming from Redmond, WA ;-). UNIX, including
the version now marketed by Apple, is pretty safe.

David, ex-W8EZE, whose computers are happily MS-free except for safe 11
year old versions of Word and Excel

--
David or Jo Anne Ryeburn

To send e-mail, remove the letter "z" from this address.

Ed Price September 20th 03 09:41 PM


"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
Is anyone else being deluged with Virus/Worm email messages?
--

================================

Me too - 2000 per day.

Terrorist attack or just another up-and-coming Bill Gates?

G4FGQ, UK




I don't recall anything in Gates' career that's equivalent to the present
worm attack.
Do you have any factual backup for your off-hand slander?

Ed
WB6WSN


pez September 20th 03 10:03 PM

Yes.
In the last two or three days.
A lot of them.

pez
SV7BAX

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message ...
| Is anyone else being deluged with Virus/Worm email messages?
| --
| 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
|
|
|
| -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
| http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
| -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Dennis Kaylor September 20th 03 10:17 PM

boy looks like you guys are getting the long end of the stick
i have had over 300 emails in the past 24 hours and i would say 100 of
them had virus attachments with them
thank the gods for spam filters and norton antivirus running all the time


Richard Clark September 20th 03 11:00 PM

On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 12:57:53 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Is anyone else being deluged with Virus/Worm email messages?


Hi All,

Almost across the board, the problem is glaringly evident, and
certainly one you choose to live with. :-)

X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165

the body count associated with those reporting:
1000 overnight last night and about 2500 the day before
over 600
MB worth. So many that E-mail drive was filled on Friday.
2000 per day


Of ten current correspondents, 8 use insecure MS products and their
numbers of incoming mails are easily 10 fold over the two that are
not. (Walt, even though you now use Agent for news reading, you still
use Outlook Express for mail).

My count stands at 0 aside from the usual load of porn that Agent
filters directly into the bit bucket (perhaps one half to one dozen a
day).

This doesn't protect me entirely. My own ISP's newserver (being a
microsoft product) decided to whack out during the Blaster attack by
resetting my cable modem every 15 seconds (through the early hours
when I simply turned off my machine). Through the attack (again, my
machine was still off), I contacted Comcast's service line to get a
fellow pitifully scripted to provide no real answers:
him: "our network is currently down"
me: "are you using MS servers?"
him: "No"
me: "What are you doing about it?"
him: "We are in contact with MS about the problem."
me: (significant silence)
him: (keys banging away) "I cannot ping your modem."
me: "The network is down. Why did you even try?"
him: (significant silence)

For several weeks afterword, their still infected server was sending
infected e-mails in my behalf, using an old address (not even in my
machine anymore after being changed from AT&T) they keep for
forwarding. How do I know I wasn't infected? I corresponded daily
through another ISP (my co-host) without a hitch through the entire
period.

Visit:
http://grc.com/default.htm
to obtain security fixes BEFORE the viruses are diagnosed through
autopsy. I've been living quite free of these problems (aside from
stupid Comcast) WITHOUT ONE MS security (sic) upgrade for 8 years.

Now, as to you having made this choice of product and enjoying the
virtues of all the marketing concepts. MS has clearly described how
to fix these problems by turning all javascript and OLE switches off -
and I might add, never double clicking OE or IE.
feds: "When are you going to take care of these virus problems?"
MS: "Viruses are not our fault, prosecute the lawbreakers."

In today's Business section (Seattle):
"Goodby, Mr. Bill Gates?
Japan, South Korea and China
discuss working to promote Linux"
"But the Redmond-based company
said 'consumers and market forces,
not government preferences, should
determine software selection...'"

8 out of 10 here support MS's agenda, and it shows in the numbers.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Wedgew September 20th 03 11:14 PM

I'm getting 30 to 50 per day and another about half that number of of
messages from my isp stating that they had trapped a virus (blaster worm)

David Robbins wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
m...

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...

Is anyone else being deluged with Virus/Worm email messages?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


Yes, 14 yesterday and 4 so far this morning.



you must not have many friends who have you in their address book... i got
about 1000 overnight last night and about 2500 the day before.




Dave Shrader September 20th 03 11:47 PM

Cecil, the virus/worm messages at my QTH got so bad that I went to my
non read mail list at Comcast and deleted over 65 message related to
Microsoft with attachments and file sizes greater than 100K. I had two
days of being flooded with messages containing viri and McAffee kept
deleting them and I had to reboot to get control. Finally, tonight,
Saturday at 6:45 EST, the backlog is temporarily [I hope] cleared off
and I am using Netscape 7.1 again instead of Comcast.

Expolit-MIME.gen and W32/SWEN@MM really flooded the net this weekend.

Deacon Dave, W1MCE
+ + +

Cecil Moore wrote:
Is anyone else being deluged with Virus/Worm email messages?



Mark Keith September 21st 03 12:06 AM

Cecil Moore wrote in message ...
Is anyone else being deluged with Virus/Worm email messages?


Only about 800 in the last 3 weeks...Sobigf was a real PIA. All the
servers thought I was sending that crap, being the e-mails are forged.
The "server" notices are as bad a spam as the actual spam or virus
itself as far as clogging bandwidth. Not to mention the 100's of
"microsoft" patches I get. My frigging anti-spam filter probably traps
75-80 funky e-mails a day. I have to weed through them often for
"good" e-mails, or I get so many stacked up, it takes an hour to weed
through them all. I have my anti-spam set to industrial strength. It
catches some "good" emails... MK

Irv Finkleman September 21st 03 01:27 AM

Cecil Moore wrote:

Is anyone else being deluged with Virus/Worm email messages?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----


Last night I downloaded a program called Mailwasher. It is freeware,
and very easy to use. It checks your e-mail while it is still on the
server, and you can delete it from there without having to download
it to your computer. It allows you to check the e-mail addresses
of the originating messages and have them deleted. You can then
just download what you want -- messages from friends. I just went
to Google, typed in Mailwasher, and it took me directly to the
download site. It sure helps here as I have had well over 1500
messages in the past twenty four hours! Only about fifty were wanted.
The problem is that I belong to 8 newsgroups, and that's where a
lot of the email addresses get harvested! This is one of the eight!

I don't think there's much can be done until everyone clears the
virus off their computers. Although I am virus free, it still doesn't
stop the e-mails from coming in!
--
--------------------------------------
Diagnosed Type II Diabetes March 5 2001
Beating it with diet and exercise!
297/215/210 (to be revised lower)
58"/43"(!)/44" (already lower too!)
--------------------------------------
Visit my HomePage at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv/
Visit my very special website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv4/
Visit my CFSRS/CFIOG ONLINE OLDTIMERS website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv5/
--------------------
Irv Finkleman,
Grampa/Ex-Navy/Old Fart/Ham Radio VE6BP
Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Mike Coslo September 21st 03 01:33 AM

Ed Price wrote:
"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...

Is anyone else being deluged with Virus/Worm email messages?
--


================================

Me too - 2000 per day.

Terrorist attack or just another up-and-coming Bill Gates?

G4FGQ, UK





I don't recall anything in Gates' career that's equivalent to the present
worm attack.
Do you have any factual backup for your off-hand slander?


He isn't responsible for this.

But he IS responsible for the abysmally poor software his company
writes. It is a litany of flaws.

- Mike KB3EIA -


RB September 21st 03 01:35 AM

The virus is in the original attachments and at the web site the text urges
you to download. If you don't open the attachment, or download the
"security patch", you won't get the virus. However, you will get floods of
this kind of traffic. It's coming from infected computers that have your
email address, and from your email address harvested from newsgroups, and
even from some web sites you've gone to. I think the flooding will continue
for awhile longer.

Some ISPs neutralize the attachment, but the message comes on through with
an empty attachment. Whatever, don't take a chance and open the attachment.

If you haven't done it yet, mung your newsgroup email address so this won't
happen in the future. Something like . That will keep
you from getting flooded in the future.



Martin September 21st 03 02:02 AM

If you use Norton System Works or Norton Antivirus, bring up their main
configuration screen, click on antivirus options email and choose the
last item: "Repair and silently delete if unsuccessful". The messages end
up pronto in the Deleted Item folder where you can check later for desirable
messages that might have slipped through and then get rid of all the nasties
with one right click on that folder. Saves a lot of aggravation. Keep
incoming email scanning on.

Marty K1FHR


"RB" wrote in message ...
The virus is in the original attachments and at the web site the text

urges
you to download. If you don't open the attachment, or download the
"security patch", you won't get the virus. However, you will get floods

of
this kind of traffic. It's coming from infected computers that have your
email address, and from your email address harvested from newsgroups, and
even from some web sites you've gone to. I think the flooding will

continue
for awhile longer.

Some ISPs neutralize the attachment, but the message comes on through with
an empty attachment. Whatever, don't take a chance and open the

attachment.

If you haven't done it yet, mung your newsgroup email address so this

won't
happen in the future. Something like . That will

keep
you from getting flooded in the future.





Ed Price September 21st 03 02:08 AM


"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
...
Ed Price wrote:
"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...

Is anyone else being deluged with Virus/Worm email messages?
--

================================

Me too - 2000 per day.

Terrorist attack or just another up-and-coming Bill Gates?

G4FGQ, UK





I don't recall anything in Gates' career that's equivalent to the

present
worm attack.
Do you have any factual backup for your off-hand slander?


He isn't responsible for this.

But he IS responsible for the abysmally poor software his company
writes. It is a litany of flaws.

- Mike KB3EIA -


My point is that you should save your litanies for the correct occasions.
You can't respond to every net problem with a half-ass reference to
"Redmond" or "Gates".

In point of fact, this IS a terrorist attack. Although software should be
robust, the majority of your ire should be directed toward the terrorist
attacker.

Ed
WB6WSN


Cecil Moore September 21st 03 05:12 AM

'Doc wrote:
The two smartest things I've ever done was invest in a
good antivirus program and a good firewall.


I've got those but they don't block the emails telling me a virus
has been removed.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Mark Keith September 21st 03 05:45 AM

"Ed Price" wrote in message

I don't recall anything in Gates' career that's equivalent to the present
worm attack.
Do you have any factual backup for your off-hand slander?

Ed
WB6WSN


Well, as far as I'm concerned, he had as much hand in it as anyone. If
his company would quit selling reader software with enough holes to
qualify as swiss cheese, many of these macro viruses wouldn't have a
leg to stand on. I've had 100's of server returns accusing me of
spreading viruses, and also that I'm running Microsoft Outlook Express
6.00.2600.0000. But this is not the case. I use old bulletproof
netscape 3.1 to read mail. These viruses are a non issue to me. Why
are they an issue to a software that is supposed to be a step up from
the ancient reader I'm using? If everyone would quit running Billware
6.00.2600.0000, we could nip this macro virus thing in the bud.
Probably would stop 90% of it overnight. Heck, with all the latest
holes in these new win OS's they are spitting out, I'm temped to stay
with win98 a few more years. MK

Ed Price September 21st 03 08:37 AM


"Mark Keith" wrote in message
om...
"Ed Price" wrote in message

I don't recall anything in Gates' career that's equivalent to the

present
worm attack.
Do you have any factual backup for your off-hand slander?

Ed
WB6WSN


Well, as far as I'm concerned, he had as much hand in it as anyone. If
his company would quit selling reader software with enough holes to
qualify as swiss cheese, many of these macro viruses wouldn't have a
leg to stand on. I've had 100's of server returns accusing me of
spreading viruses, and also that I'm running Microsoft Outlook Express
6.00.2600.0000. But this is not the case. I use old bulletproof
netscape 3.1 to read mail. These viruses are a non issue to me. Why
are they an issue to a software that is supposed to be a step up from
the ancient reader I'm using? If everyone would quit running Billware
6.00.2600.0000, we could nip this macro virus thing in the bud.
Probably would stop 90% of it overnight. Heck, with all the latest
holes in these new win OS's they are spitting out, I'm temped to stay
with win98 a few more years. MK


In other words, nothing factual, just "as far as I'm concerned." Thank you
for your rant.

Ed
WB6WSN


Dee D. Flint September 21st 03 01:28 PM


"David or Jo Anne Ryeburn" wrote in message
...
In article , "Dee D.
Flint" wrote:

I've tried to trap them but the headers and senders, etc are all

different.

The "From:" lines are likely forged. Many such worms and viruses pick
recipients and purported senders randomly from the infected computer's
Outlook or Outlook Express address list. If you want to see where the
message really is coming from, examine full headers carefully --
specifically, the "Received: from" lines.

If you have a suggestion on how to stop them, please let us all in on

it.

Persuade the universe to cease using unsafe operating system software,
browsers, and e-mail programs coming from Redmond, WA ;-). UNIX, including
the version now marketed by Apple, is pretty safe.

David, ex-W8EZE, whose computers are happily MS-free except for safe 11
year old versions of Word and Excel


If everyone switched to UNIX, the solution would be short-lived as the virus
writers would then switch to attacking it. Right now, they simply get more
"bang for the buck" by attacking Windows and it doesn't give them much of a
thrill to also go after UNIX system users or Apple computer users.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


'Doc September 21st 03 04:08 PM

Cecil,
Each antivirus program is different, but most have
an email checking option, both incoming and outgoing
email. That option should be activated. The options
for email checking vary, some require that you decide
what to do about an infected email, some will 'clean'
it automatically or get rid of it in some way. Which
method you choose is up to you.
Firewalls are even more varied than antivirus
programs and are a real P.I.T.A. to set up correctly.
so R.T.F.M. is the key with them. It also depends on
the programs/TSR's you use. Some are not safe at all.
Richard listed a site in his post that is very very good
about telling you the how/what/where about spamming and
virus/worm/?? activities. The utilities on that site
work, are a good idea, and I recommend them.
'Doc

PS - These virus 'floods' are still a P.I.T.A. and I
have to delete them, but they stand NO chance of
infecting my machine.

J. McLaughlin September 21st 03 04:12 PM

Dear Mr. Flint and group:
I am told by knowledgeable UNIX people (another partitioning of the
world) that the structure of UNIX is such that attacks can not be
successful. I am told that there are only three ports into/outof UNIX
modules and it is simple to guard them.
The Bill ware OSs allow all sorts of back doors and side doors and
over-the-transom ports.
What I do not understand is why someone has not funded a set of
bright Indian programmers to produce an OS that can execute Window
programs without committing the errors made by Bill's people. There is
a Unix based program that is able to execute some, well behaved Windows
programs.
I threaten my students with eternal haunting if they ever write a
control program in Bill style. 73 Mac N8TT

--
J. Mc Laughlin - Michigan USA
Home:

"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
.com...

"David or Jo Anne Ryeburn" wrote in message
...
In article , "Dee

D.
Flint" wrote:

snip

Persuade the universe to cease using unsafe operating system

software,
browsers, and e-mail programs coming from Redmond, WA ;-). UNIX,

including
the version now marketed by Apple, is pretty safe.

David, ex-W8EZE, whose computers are happily MS-free except for safe

11
year old versions of Word and Excel


If everyone switched to UNIX, the solution would be short-lived as the

virus
writers would then switch to attacking it. Right now, they simply get

more
"bang for the buck" by attacking Windows and it doesn't give them much

of a
thrill to also go after UNIX system users or Apple computer users.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE



Alexander Schewelew September 21st 03 05:57 PM

Virus/Worm - What is it?

73!,
Alexander, DL1PBD



David or Jo Anne Ryeburn September 21st 03 06:25 PM

In article ,
wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 00:37:03 -0700, "Ed Price"
wrote:

In other words, nothing factual, just "as far as I'm concerned." Thank you
for your rant.


That was no rant, and pretty factual. Microsoft has left security
hole after security hole. Further, almost none of this would happen
if people would stop using Outlook and Outlook Express for mail. A
good text based email and news program like Agent goes a long way
toward preventing both accidental infection and spreading of the
trash that currently pollutes the system so heavily. Eudora used to
be good also, but I haven't used it in almost 10 years so it could
have given in to the weaknesses by now.


Eudora is a mail-only program, not a mail plus news program. It hasn't
given in to those weaknesses, at least not on the Mac platform, and I
understand that the Windows version of it is very similar to the Mac
version. (Historically, the Mac version of Eudora came first, and it was
ported to Windows when Qualcomm bought it from the University of
Illinois.)

The latest version, Eudora 6, has been available on both platforms for
several weeks now, and I recently upgraded to it. As has been the case for
some time, Eudora can be configured three ways: Light, Sponsored, and
Paid. The Paid version has no ads and has a new SPAM filter which can
learn what to do over time, very effective I am told. The Sponsored
version is the same as the Paid version except that it doesn't cost money,
there are small ads in the corner of the screen (easily ignorable, and I
ignore them), and the anti-SPAM feature is missing (but you can use other
SPAM-filtering software, or you can easily set up your own filters within
Eudora if you don't opt for Eudora's built-in method of filtering). The
Light version has no ads but lacks many features of the other two
versions. SFU and Telus have very effective SPAM-defeating and
virus-defeating features so I didn't spend the extra US $ 40 to get the
Paid version; otherwise, I would have done so.

Eudora can import mailboxes and address lists from many common e-mail
programs including Outlook and Outlook Express. Using this effective and
safe e-mail program, or another safe one, is an easy first step in
avoiding incoming malware.

Using a different browser than IE is another easy thing to do. My wife
likes Mozilla (available for both Windows and Macintosh). Mozilla today is
what Netscape will be many months from now. The latest completed version
is 1.4; 1.5 is in alpha or beta, but I don't play with such things.
Mozilla is OK but I like iCab better. iCab (Macs only) is an excellent
browser that can be configured to tell useful lies about its identity, and
that of the computer on which it is installed. My copy of iCab is
configured to claim to be IE 6 running on a Windows machine. This lets me
access certain sites (such as some banks) which, for no good reason, turn
away browsers other than IE, or computers other than Windows machines, or
both. Mozilla and iCab are a lot safer browsers than IE. Lying about being
IE doesn't make a browser susceptible to the things IE is susceptible, and
lying about being a Windows machine doesn't make a Mac susceptbile to
Windows-only worms and viruses.

By the way, what "J. McLaughlin" said in article


I am told by knowledgeable UNIX people (another partitioning of the
world) that the structure of UNIX is such that attacks can not be
successful. I am told that there are only three ports into/outof UNIX
modules and it is simple to guard them.
The Bill ware OSs allow all sorts of back doors and side doors and
over-the-transom ports.


agrees with what I have been told by people at SFU. It's not just the
popularity of Windows that accounts for its susceptibility to viruses and
worms.

To cheer everyone up some more, I just learned that a Windows variant will
be coming soon to an ATM near you. See

http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,60497,00.html

When I gave this URL to an old friend of mine (currently a Windows user,
and not enjoying it) who is a retired IBM employee, she replied

Yuck! I wish I was back on OS/2.


David, ex-W8EZE, strong believer in safer computing

--
David or Jo Anne Ryeburn

To send e-mail, remove the letter "z" from this address.

Richard Clark September 21st 03 07:31 PM

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 10:08:46 -0500, 'Doc wrote:

Cecil,
Each antivirus program is different, but most have
an email checking option, both incoming and outgoing
email. That option should be activated. The options
for email checking vary, some require that you decide
what to do about an infected email, some will 'clean'
it automatically or get rid of it in some way. Which
method you choose is up to you.
Firewalls are even more varied than antivirus
programs and are a real P.I.T.A. to set up correctly.
so R.T.F.M. is the key with them. It also depends on
the programs/TSR's you use. Some are not safe at all.
Richard listed a site in his post that is very very good
about telling you the how/what/where about spamming and
virus/worm/?? activities. The utilities on that site
work, are a good idea, and I recommend them.
'Doc

PS - These virus 'floods' are still a P.I.T.A. and I
have to delete them, but they stand NO chance of
infecting my machine.


Hi Doc,

To again offer that link:
http://grc.com/default.htm
to obtain security fixes BEFORE the viruses are diagnosed through
autopsy. I've been living quite free of these problems (aside from
stupid Comcast) WITHOUT ONE MS security (sic) upgrade for 8 years.


I also have not used an "antivirus" program in 12 years. In that same
time I have probably downloaded several 10's of GB of software, run
it, kept some, discarded most, and to no ill effect. In fact, I am
probably my own worst enemy when some 15 years ago I was writing a
file interface where one wrong bit erased my hard drive before my jaw
could sag.

Yesterday only two (2) emails arrived and were caught by one of 7
email filters in my purchased version of Agent - all of them set to
trash porn. No other email at all (pretty slow day). They may have
been part of this latest Virus, perhaps not, I will never know and I
don't care either way. Clearly 80% of those who suffer and complain
have some sort of Masochistic need to feed their habit.

The folks at Agent are about to release version 2 which will have many
more configurable features like multiple accounts support, multiple
connection support, folders within folders (for hierarchal email and
article storage) and all while maintaining a safe separation between
sanity and MS. I will only have to pay an upgrade fee, but I would
buy into it full price without hesitation.

I also use Agnitum Outpost Firewall. Visit:
http://www.agnitum.com/
This blows away nearly all the ads that fill up the browser display
(leaving only their default titles as links). When an ad slips
through to annoy me, I just add it to the list Outpost ignores
downloading. I can set any application's level of trust and block
traffic in configurable settings (however, default Outpost works quite
well out of the box) - and this is the FREE version.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Roger Halstead September 21st 03 09:04 PM

On 20 Sep 2003 21:45:27 -0700, (Mark Keith) wrote:

"Ed Price" wrote in message

I don't recall anything in Gates' career that's equivalent to the present
worm attack.
Do you have any factual backup for your off-hand slander?

Ed
WB6WSN


Well, as far as I'm concerned, he had as much hand in it as anyone. If
his company would quit selling reader software with enough holes to
qualify as swiss cheese, many of these macro viruses wouldn't have a
leg to stand on. I've had 100's of server returns accusing me of
spreading viruses, and also that I'm running Microsoft Outlook Express
6.00.2600.0000. But this is not the case. I use old bulletproof
netscape 3.1 to read mail. These viruses are a non issue to me. Why


I would respectfully suggest that you upgrade to one of the later
versions of Netscape. 3.1 is about as open to giving out your
information as any produced.

I run Netscape, Mozilla (slightly different but Netscape used a
Mozilla core) Thunderbird, and Pearl.

are they an issue to a software that is supposed to be a step up from
the ancient reader I'm using? If everyone would quit running Billware
6.00.2600.0000, we could nip this macro virus thing in the bud.


If every one would practice safe computing even Bill Ware would work
well.
Probably would stop 90% of it overnight. Heck, with all the latest


The users alone could prevent more than that. Remember that in *most*
cases they worms and viruses require the user to run them. Only
recently have the true viruses that run when you read them become much
of a problem.
holes in these new win OS's they are spitting out, I'm temped to stay


It's not the OS. IT's the mail and news readers and even then it's
more of a problem with the default settings. It's also a lack of
firewalls and virus checkers.

If people would just turn off java, HTML, the automated entry of
addresses into their address books, turn off the ability to
automatically run macros when opening a document, and not run
attachments until they verify who ever sent it did so on purpose.
there would be few successful viruses.

It's a knee jerk reaction to blame the OS (which do have lots of holes
in them), but in reality the blame for well over 90% of the problem
comes directly from us...the users.
How many people have you heard state that "they" only open attachments
from people they know. That virus, or worm had to get the address
form some where and it was in some ones address book.
with win98 a few more years. MK


The new ones are no worse than 98, or 98 SE.
And the early versions of Netscape were terrible for leaking
information about the user.

Computer People forget that over 90% of computer users are clueless.

Roger K8RI (Retired computer systems project manager)

Roger Halstead (K8RI EN73 & ARRL Life Member)
www.rogerhalstead.com
N833R World's oldest Debonair? (S# CD-2)

Bill September 22nd 03 02:33 AM

Your Unix people told you wrong. Mail worms were invented back before
Outlook, in a primarily unix based internetwork.

"bright Indian programmers" do not exist. If you are going to count on that
craphole of a place to produce anything usable, then you have a hard wake up
coming. A nation without flush toilets is hardly technologically advanced
to write an OS of any merit...just think...those idiots have nuclear
weapons...probably aimed at themselves.

Mac...just what is Bill style?



"J. McLaughlin" wrote in message
...
Dear Mr. Flint and group:
I am told by knowledgeable UNIX people (another partitioning of the
world) that the structure of UNIX is such that attacks can not be
successful. I am told that there are only three ports into/outof UNIX
modules and it is simple to guard them.
The Bill ware OSs allow all sorts of back doors and side doors and
over-the-transom ports.
What I do not understand is why someone has not funded a set of
bright Indian programmers to produce an OS that can execute Window
programs without committing the errors made by Bill's people. There is
a Unix based program that is able to execute some, well behaved Windows
programs.
I threaten my students with eternal haunting if they ever write a
control program in Bill style. 73 Mac N8TT

--
J. Mc Laughlin - Michigan USA
Home:

"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
.com...

"David or Jo Anne Ryeburn" wrote in message
...
In article , "Dee

D.
Flint" wrote:

snip

Persuade the universe to cease using unsafe operating system

software,
browsers, and e-mail programs coming from Redmond, WA ;-). UNIX,

including
the version now marketed by Apple, is pretty safe.

David, ex-W8EZE, whose computers are happily MS-free except for safe

11
year old versions of Word and Excel


If everyone switched to UNIX, the solution would be short-lived as the

virus
writers would then switch to attacking it. Right now, they simply get

more
"bang for the buck" by attacking Windows and it doesn't give them much

of a
thrill to also go after UNIX system users or Apple computer users.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE





Roger Halstead September 22nd 03 03:43 AM

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:28:16 GMT, "Dee D. Flint"
wrote:


"David or Jo Anne Ryeburn" wrote in message
...
In article , "Dee D.
Flint" wrote:

I've tried to trap them but the headers and senders, etc are all

different.


Waste of time. It *used* to work, but rarely will it now. Check the
IP, not the from address.

The "From:" lines are likely forged. Many such worms and viruses pick
recipients and purported senders randomly from the infected computer's


They also make them up, or combine several to make one.

Outlook or Outlook Express address list. If you want to see where the
message really is coming from, examine full headers carefully --
specifically, the "Received: from" lines


Look for the IP.


If you have a suggestion on how to stop them, please let us all in on

it.

Persuade the universe to cease using unsafe operating system software,
browsers, and e-mail programs coming from Redmond, WA ;-). UNIX, including
the version now marketed by Apple, is pretty safe.


Unfortunately this is not really the case.
There are no truly safe operating systems (and yes MS has a few more
problems than others), but the cases in point are not operating system
problems. They are mail and newsgroup reader problems and *nearly*
all can be prevented by properly configuring said programs. Turn off
the ability to read mail in HTML, don't let macros run, disable Java,
and above all don't open attachments until after verifying whoever
really sent it. This is particularly true if the thing came from some
one you know. How many times have you heard some one say, Oh, I don't
worry. I only open attachments from people I know. Now there is a
prime candidate for a virus.

MS operating systems are written for the masses. It depends on your
definition of computer literate, but unless you make the definition
very lenient there are few computer users who are computer literate.

In grad school I taught intro to Computer Science. It was one of
those courses where we taught them to turn 'em on, insert a disk, run
an app, save the date, and turn it off.

I had 195 students. 5 or so shouldn't have been in there as they knew
as much as I did and I was working on my masters in CS. Unfortunately
they fell into one of those cases where they had to take the course.
Another 5 or so were never going to survive that simple goal of the
class. The other 185 covered the spectrum in between. Oh...I had
about 10 that could type.

I'm not defending windows...What I am doing is trying to show where we
have gone wrong across the board and the unlikely prospect of it being
fixed soon...if ever.

Windows was designed to be user friendly. Any one who has done much
programming at all knows the more you work to make a "program" user
friendly the more difficult it becomes for the programmer. The
program becomes more complex. Sometimes much more complex and with
each increase in complexity comes an increase in the likely hood of
"side effects".

For those unfamiliar with the term, side effects are ... well...just
that...They are unexpected operations, outputs, or even capabilities
from a program, routine, or function that were not expected. Just
like side effects from a medication, only in this case it gives your
computer a case of diarrhea.

Windows was also designed to create a uniform environment for
programmers that would also simplify program design...I.E. The DLL,
or Dynamic Linked Library.

You can create a relatively small but capable program in Visual Basic,
or Visual C++. However, compile it into a stand alone program that
can be installed on other computers and it will become huge. It
includes all the needed DLLs. A 32 K program can easily become 10 or
20 megs. However when you install it the program will only install
DLLs that are newer than the ones on the computer. It will ask if you
want to install a DLL if the DLL is older than the one currently on
the computer. So that 32K program that turned into 9 megs may only
add a 100K or so to some computers.

Outlook and Outlook Express make use of these integrated functions, or
DLLs. Unfortunately they also come with the default settings

Which brings me to the main fault of windows. The one that most likely
will never be cured. US...You, me, who ever is at the keyboard, that
is where the main responsibility lies. We want HTML as it makes the
netzines look nice. We want it so we can send professional looking
letters and resumes even if it does have the capability of reporting
back to who ever sent you the unwanted e-mail. We want Java running.
It does do some neat things. We want macros enabled so when we
receive that database it will be displayed as the builder intended and
we only have to fill in the blanks. Never mind that the macro can do
anything on your computer that you can...probably more in most cases.

You can do all the education you want, but if the user wants to use
those functions/capabilities then they are going to use them whether
it opens their computer up to the whole wide world or not.

Virus checkers and spam botts are a necessity to keep track of many
things. Some reputable companies seem to be including trojans and spy
bots in their soft ware. That stuff lets them track your every move.
I have no idea as to why they'd want to track mine, but... "SpyBot
Search & Destroy" has found a number of them. In one year I received
over 250 copies of viruses and worms. BTW, SpyBot, Search & Destroy
is free and does a great job. The writer is just looking for
donations.

So, were Windows to disappear tomorrow, we might get a brief respite
from the viruses while the writers retrenched, but they would be back.
The users, still looking for functionality above all else would soon
be complaining about the security in the new OS, even though they had
been taught the principals of safe computing.


David, ex-W8EZE, whose computers are happily MS-free except for safe 11
year old versions of Word and Excel


In the computing world older is often not better. If word and excel
can run macros when you receive them, or load a document then they are
vulnerable. To top it off they can't read any of the documents from
newer versions. Old versions of Netscape are particularly bad, but
early Internet Explorer was no better. Being MS free is no guarantee
of safety.


If everyone switched to UNIX, the solution would be short-lived as the virus
writers would then switch to attacking it. Right now, they simply get more
"bang for the buck" by attacking Windows and it doesn't give them much of a
thrill to also go after UNIX system users or Apple computer users.


Yup! I have to admit that Unix/Linux, and Apple might be a bit more
work, but they are not immune. Once some one, or a group puts
together the tools in a package the script kiddies take over and use
them like an erector set.

Without going into details, Worms and viruses can be amazingly simple
to write. I wrote a worm as an under grad student. It was only on
paper. I gave it to my instructor and asked if we could try it on a
virtual machine. After studying the thing for just a couple of
minutes he said, I don't think we better try it. I gave him the
paper and said "You keep it". The simplest being the macro viruses.
OTOH, some of these things are getting pretty sophisticated. They
"call home" to see if there is an update to their code,or payload.
They don't always behave the same. Now we have some that don't
require user intervention if the default settings are such as to let
them loose.

Still, the vast majority depend on the "idiot" at the keyboard. IF
the user never opened the attachment without verification, never let
some one trick them into installing a patch from MS, or some other
company (those companies don't work that way), never deleted a file
because the official looking e-mail told them to do so, never
answered an e-mail asking them to update their account information,
(particularly when they ask for the account name), and actually
practiced safe computing the virus and worm problem would become a
relatively small irritation.

BTW, I've set here and watched the firewall report probes of the
ports. They would start, try a port, not get in, try the next port,
and repeat until they had gone through the whole list, and then start
over. It doesn't matter if you have one port, or 10,000. If you have
one open that is all it takes.

Contrary to government figures as to computer literacy, I doubt any
where near half the population could truly be called computer
literate. When it comes to computer savvy, I doubt more than 5 to
maybe 10% would qualify and I think 10% is really stretching it.

If 75 to 80% were really computer literate spam and viruses would not
be any where near the present problem. It's part ignorance and part
apathy...The old "It only happens to other people" syndrome. Kinda
like the immortal teenager in his invincible SUV. I drove half way
though one of those a couple of years back and shortened my Transam up
nearly two feet. (My last thoughts before impact we "Boy, I'll bet
this is gonna hurt") Surprisingly I wasn't even sore the next day,
but man was I punch for about a half an hour after the impact. I
don't think a 6-pack would have that much effect.

An aside to security...Using signed documents...Verisign recently
hijacked all the unused dot coms and a bunch of other extensions.
Type in a non existent URL and see where you end up. They get paid
for every so called click through. That means they get paid for every
invalid address typed. As a warning...You end up with the prompt for
a secure page and no graceful way to say no. IF you say Yes they
make money. In windows that just means using the program manager to
close the browser. And...Yes they are already getting sued.

Roger Halstead (K8RI EN73 & ARRL Life Member)
www.rogerhalstead.com
N833R World's oldest Debonair? (S# CD-2)

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE



Roger Halstead September 22nd 03 03:47 AM

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 10:13:26 -0600, wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 00:37:03 -0700, "Ed Price"
wrote:

In other words, nothing factual, just "as far as I'm concerned." Thank you
for your rant.


That was no rant, and pretty factual. Microsoft has left security
hole after security hole. Further, almost none of this would happen
if people would stop using Outlook and Outlook Express for mail. A


Outlook and OE are both capable of operating as text based if the user
would set the defaults properly. When configured so they are just as
resistant to attack as the other text based readers.

They are every bit as capable as Agent which I happen to be using
here as I prefer the way it handles newsgroups better than the other
two.

Roger Halstead (K8RI EN73 & ARRL Life Member)
www.rogerhalstead.com
N833R World's oldest Debonair? (S# CD-2)

good text based email and news program like Agent goes a long way
toward preventing both accidental infection and spreading of the
trash that currently pollutes the system so heavily. Eudora used to
be good also, but I haven't used it in almost 10 years so it could
have given in to the weaknesses by now.

gm



Roger Halstead September 22nd 03 03:56 AM

On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 19:35:23 -0500, "RB" wrote:

The virus is in the original attachments and at the web site the text urges
you to download. If you don't open the attachment, or download the
"security patch", you won't get the virus. However, you will get floods of
this kind of traffic. It's coming from infected computers that have your


That's why I keep changing my posting address. I use a valid one, but
it changes as soon as the spam starts to build.


email address, and from your email address harvested from newsgroups, and
even from some web sites you've gone to. I think the flooding will continue
for awhile longer.

Some ISPs neutralize the attachment, but the message comes on through with
an empty attachment. Whatever, don't take a chance and open the attachment.

If you haven't done it yet, mung your newsgroup email address so this won't
happen in the future. Something like . That will keep
you from getting flooded in the future.


Now that is one of my pet peeves. I always use a valid address,
although it changes from time to time. Every once in a while I
receive an e-mail off a newsgroup and almost invariably the sender
forgets to make the return valid. Those get treated just like spam.

Just go to one of the e-mail services and get a throwaway address. Use
it till it starts getting spam and viruses. Then cancel it and create
a new one. If you don't want to receive e-mail from the newsgroups
don't use a valid address and state so in your sig. The easiest is to
just make the address "don'treply@email or some such that indicates
you don't want to be bothered with e-mail answers.

Roger Halstead (K8RI EN73 & ARRL Life Member)
www.rogerhalstead.com
N833R World's oldest Debonair? (S# CD-2)




Zoran Brlecic September 22nd 03 04:42 AM

Bill wrote:

"bright Indian programmers" do not exist. If you are going to count on that
craphole of a place to produce anything usable, then you have a hard wake up
coming. A nation without flush toilets is hardly technologically advanced
to write an OS of any merit...just think...those idiots have nuclear
weapons...probably aimed at themselves.



Funny... some people would claim the same about trailer trash rednecks
like you.


--

Anti-spam measu look me up on qrz.com if you need to reply directly


Ryan, KC8PMX September 22nd 03 06:14 AM

Yep.... in one account I am getting something like 1200-1500 of the alleged
"Microsoft" patch per day, and about 3 weeks ago I got nailed the same way
with the Sobig:f virus. Since the release of these viruses, I now use the
"webmail" mail servers before downloading any email through Outlook Express.

I haven't been affected by the viruses in regards to what they were designed
directly to do, but affected by the time it takes to download email or going
through the webmail service that my ISP offers. I am quite sure that I am
not the only one and I am sure that these bogus emails are depleting free
space on the email servers in general.


--
Ryan, KC8PMX
FF1-FF2-MFR-(pending NREMT-B!)
--. --- -.. ... .- -. --. . .-.. ... .- .-. . ..-. .. .-. . ..-.
... --. .... - . .-. ...
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Is anyone else being deluged with Virus/Worm email messages?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----





All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com