Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:50:05 -0600, "Richard Fry"
wrote: "Richard Clark" wrote The transmission line being orthogonal is in the plane of the dipole's null - hence zero conduction. ___________ But the nulls of a dipole are off its ends. The t-line connects to the dipole center, where relative field normal to the longitudinal axis of the dipole is at a maximum. Hi OM, It takes only a moment to visualize a dipole, frozen in time, where each arm supports the opposite charge. The continuum of forces between the two, in three-space, shows a distinct plane of response where a net-zero force is exhibited. This reference plane, a virtual ground, falls between the poles and is orthogonal. A common artifice of erecting vertically polarized antennas above dipoles bears this out. The two are invisible to each other. It also allows for the use of towers to support beams, but also explains why guy wires which violate balance (do not fall within the plane) must be broken up as conductors. The towers have a smaller degree of coupling than do the guy wires that support them. Even folded dipoles in commercial installations make use of this reference plane by providing a mounting point (180 degrees from the feed) to the support structure. No regard needs to be made for "shorting" out the loop at this point. The null you speak of is exhibited in the far field - the utility of BalUn/Chokes are in the near field. The transmission line may lie within the reference plane, but its metallic connection to one of the poles necessarily violates the electrical balance. The BalUn/Choke isolates this connection. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Parallel balun problem with wire loop | Antenna | |||
Adding a 2:1 balun to a multi-band dipole | Antenna | |||
Antenna Questions | Shortwave | |||
Balun Grounding Question ? | Shortwave | |||
Balun Grounding Question ? | Antenna |