Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 17th 03, 11:18 AM
Ian White, G3SEK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tom Bruhns wrote:
I'm also saying that the voltage (potential) between two points
depends, in general, on the path you take between the two points. You
should be _especially_ aware of that fact when you're in the presence
of time-varying magnetic fields, such as you have around a powered
antenna.


In practice that will means that the voltage you measure between say the
end of a whip and ground will depend on how you choose to route the
connecting leads to the voltmeter, and how you connect to ground... and
above (below?) all on what you define "ground" to be.


--
73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book'
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek
  #2   Report Post  
Old October 17th 03, 05:44 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ian White, G3SEK wrote:
In practice that will means that the voltage you measure between say the
end of a whip and ground will depend on how you choose to route the
connecting leads to the voltmeter, and how you connect to ground... and
above (below?) all on what you define "ground" to be.


How about using an artificial ground at the measurement point?
--
73, Cecil, W5DXP

  #3   Report Post  
Old October 17th 03, 10:29 PM
Ian White, G3SEK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cecil Moore wrote:
Ian White, G3SEK wrote:
In practice that will means that the voltage you measure between say
the end of a whip and ground will depend on how you choose to route
the connecting leads to the voltmeter, and how you connect to
ground... and above (below?) all on what you define "ground" to be.


How about using an artificial ground at the measurement point?


Define one, if you can! What are its properties, and how would you
achieve them?

It's rather like the early wireless users who "earthed" their receivers
to the aspidistra pot in the corner of the room - after all, it
contained earth, so why didn't it work?


--
73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book'
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek
  #4   Report Post  
Old October 17th 03, 11:16 PM
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

How 'bout you model it with your concept of an "artificial ground", and
let us know the result? You can measure the voltage with EZNEC by
connecting the two points to be measured with a wire and inserting a
zero amplitude current source in the wire. The source will act like an
open circuit, and the voltage will be reported in the Source Data output.

After you've determined the voltage relative to your "artificial
ground", modify the "artificial ground" and note the effect on the
voltage. Then see if you can figure out what the voltage is between the
"artificial ground" and the Earth. Or, give us your justification for
assuming that it's zero. If it is zero, via what path? As Tom has been
saying, the voltage between two points depends on the path you take
between them.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Cecil Moore wrote:
Ian White, G3SEK wrote:

In practice that will means that the voltage you measure between say
the end of a whip and ground will depend on how you choose to route
the connecting leads to the voltmeter, and how you connect to
ground... and above (below?) all on what you define "ground" to be.



How about using an artificial ground at the measurement point?
--
73, Cecil, W5DXP


  #5   Report Post  
Old October 17th 03, 11:19 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Roy Lewallen wrote:
After you've determined the voltage relative to your "artificial
ground", modify the "artificial ground" and note the effect on the
voltage. Then see if you can figure out what the voltage is between the
"artificial ground" and the Earth. Or, give us your justification for
assuming that it's zero. If it is zero, via what path? As Tom has been
saying, the voltage between two points depends on the path you take
between them.


Wow, you sure ASSume a lot from a simple question. Let's turn it around
and you guys prove that the voltage at the ends of a dipole is less
than or equal to the feedpoint voltage even though a florescent light
bulb is brighter at the ends.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----


  #6   Report Post  
Old October 18th 03, 12:40 AM
Tdonaly
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cecil wrote,

Wow, you sure ASSume a lot from a simple question. Let's turn it around
and you guys prove that the voltage at the ends of a dipole is less
than or equal to the feedpoint voltage even though a florescent light
bulb is brighter at the ends.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


What causes the light to light up, Cecil, an E field, or a V field?
You can't seem to get over the fact that the voltage between
two points in a time varying E field may not be unique and thus
not measurable. Go read the book I told you to read, Cecil,
and you'll understand why.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH


  #7   Report Post  
Old October 18th 03, 06:55 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tdonaly wrote:
What causes the light to light up, Cecil, an E field, or a V field?
You can't seem to get over the fact that the voltage between
two points in a time varying E field may not be unique and thus
not measurable. Go read the book I told you to read, Cecil,
and you'll understand why.


Why not just tell me to read the Bible where God is the cause
of everything - same difference.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #8   Report Post  
Old October 18th 03, 08:36 AM
Tdonaly
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cecil wrote,

Why not just tell me to read the Bible where God is the cause
of everything - same difference.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


That's about the kind of reply I expected, which is too bad.
It sort of reminds me of the Catholic clerics who refused to
look through Galileo's telescope.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH


  #9   Report Post  
Old October 18th 03, 07:58 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tdonaly wrote:
What causes the light to light up, Cecil, an E field, or a V field?


According to quantum electrodynamics, fields don't exist. So are
you talking about photons or virtual photons above? In either case,
voltage can still be measured by a voltmeter.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #10   Report Post  
Old October 18th 03, 08:54 AM
Tdonaly
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cecil wrote,

Tdonaly wrote:
What causes the light to light up, Cecil, an E field, or a V field?


According to quantum electrodynamics, fields don't exist. So are
you talking about photons or virtual photons above? In either case,
voltage can still be measured by a voltmeter.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


I see you've gone into objection-stopper mode: write something
whether it makes sense or not. Evidently, you don't know what
makes the little light light up, or you'd answer the question.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH






Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pls comment on this dipole Steve Antenna 6 October 15th 03 01:08 AM
shortened dipole loaded Jerry Antenna 11 October 2nd 03 01:57 AM
10m dipole and tuner G. Doughty Antenna 11 September 25th 03 04:05 AM
Comet VA30 (base loaded tri-band dipole 40/15/10) PA3HHO Antenna 2 September 1st 03 08:33 PM
Dipole connected to grounded receiver? Tom Antenna 4 July 23rd 03 12:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017