Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 20th 03, 04:23 AM
Tom Bruhns
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike Coslo wrote in message .net...
David Robbins wrote:


ARGH! another thread that will never die... time to 'ignore' this one also.
don't you guys realize you will never agree on anything on here? you talk
in circles around and around the same dogmatic circles never seeing that you
are all saying the same thing in different terms and arguing around nits
that don't matter in the real world.


I think that's the point. Cecil and his buds are doing this for
entertainment.


:-) Gee, I think Cecil is trying to carry this one by himself. I
don't see any of "his buds" on the list of contributors. Certainly
Tom, Ian, Roy and I are in very close agreement about this topic.

It is worth a step back from all this, though. If the lurkers can get
the single idea that it's the _current_ distribution on an antenna
structure that ultimately matters, not any voltages (whether we can
agree about them or not), then they'll have gained something of value.

If they also pick up some simple things like "electric fields are
always very nearly perpendicular to the surface of good conductors"
and "the potential between two points in general depends on the path
you take," that would be a nice plus. If they get curious and go
learn more about those things, that would be wonderful.

Cheers,
Tom
  #2   Report Post  
Old October 20th 03, 05:59 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tom Bruhns wrote:
:-) Gee, I think Cecil is trying to carry this one by himself. I
don't see any of "his buds" on the list of contributors. Certainly
Tom, Ian, Roy and I are in very close agreement about this topic.


I agree that *measuring* the voltage is a challenge.

It is worth a step back from all this, though. If the lurkers can get
the single idea that it's the _current_ distribution on an antenna
structure that ultimately matters, ...


It's hard to develop that H-field without an E-field. The feedpoint
impedance of a standing wave antenna gives a deductive clue to the
magnitude of the E-field and it is not the same as a traveling wave
antenna. It also varies up and down the standing wave antenna.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pls comment on this dipole Steve Antenna 6 October 15th 03 12:08 AM
shortened dipole loaded Jerry Antenna 11 October 2nd 03 12:57 AM
10m dipole and tuner G. Doughty Antenna 11 September 25th 03 03:05 AM
Comet VA30 (base loaded tri-band dipole 40/15/10) PA3HHO Antenna 2 September 1st 03 07:33 PM
Dipole connected to grounded receiver? Tom Antenna 4 July 22nd 03 11:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017