Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just one caution about this. I don't think EZNEC or other NEC-based
programs will give accurate field strength any closer to a wire than a few wire diameters. So it probably wouldn't be good for predicting the likelihood of corona discharge and the like. It might be possible, though, to model a wire as a number of very much smaller parallel wires arranged in a circle, to get good field strength values closer to the real wire. I wouldn't completely trust the results, though, until at least a few test cases were run which could be compared to theoretical values. Roy Lewallen, W7EL K7ITM wrote: Jim, K7JEB, wrote: ... Again, this is just a special case of the general problem. But it has a configuration that is easy to implement in the EZNEC program and is quite relevant to typical ham-radio, low-band dipole installations. It's also easy to get the electric field strength near the antenna from EZNEC. I expect the field to be highest near wires, because of the shape the field must take near the wires, so that's where I'd look first to get an idea about possible breakdown of the air or insulators. Cheers, Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pls comment on this dipole | Antenna | |||
shortened dipole loaded | Antenna | |||
10m dipole and tuner | Antenna | |||
Comet VA30 (base loaded tri-band dipole 40/15/10) | Antenna | |||
Dipole connected to grounded receiver? | Antenna |