Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 16:54:59 -0700, Don Lancaster
wrote: Richard Clark wrote: On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 17:00:58 GMT, "Marc H.Popek" wrote: www.fwt.niat.net This dielectric embedded antennas are smaller than naturally occurs and yet have a net gain Hi Marc, Interesting sentence construction. A cogent question would reveal some perspective: How much would your 13dBi dielectric embedded antennas for TV Channel 2 weigh? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC A lot less than they would for the 160 meter ham band. -- Many thanks, Don Lancaster Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552 voice: (928)428-4073 email: fax 847-574-1462 Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com Hi All, Don, I would least of all think that "Many thanks" was aimed specifically at me for such little contribution as I've offered; that aside, for those in the rec.radio.amateur.antenna group, I would offer that Don is one of the more "out of the box" technical thinkers (sorry for the strained expression) and I would suggest they follow the link he offers. As I have been a subscriber to Circuit Cellar since its inception, I've found Don's articles (and books before then) contained unique solutions to problems that have defied conventional analysis. Or rather those problems that have defied clear analysis through other's falling back on conventional and spontaneously dead answers. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
EH antenna, FCC certification is arrived | Antenna | |||
Ten-tec vee beam | Antenna | |||
Compact HF antenna (RX-only) for reference in antenna tests? | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |