Sir Clark,

No work on using the embedded moldable plastic dielectric at 50 Mc... as you
point out the size and weight does not appear to be advantageous.

However, above 900 the size shrink, has an advantage

we have other ideas to use the FWT at lower frequencies.... stay tuned

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 17:00:58 GMT, "Marc H.Popek"
wrote:

www.fwt.niat.net

This dielectric embedded antennas are smaller than naturally occurs and
yet
have a net gain

Hi Marc,

Interesting sentence construction.

A cogent question would reveal some perspective: How much would your
13dBi dielectric embedded antennas for TV Channel 2 weigh?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 16:17:14 GMT, "Marc H.Popek"
wrote:

Sir Clark,

No work on using the embedded moldable plastic dielectric at 50 Mc... as you
point out the size and weight does not appear to be advantageous.

However, above 900 the size shrink, has an advantage

we have other ideas to use the FWT at lower frequencies.... stay tuned


CTO?

What does that stand for in your organization?

If we are to judge your product (which, by the way, has a page down):
Standard Features
...
* Specifications - FWT Antennas can be built from 49 to 10,000 MHz.

Seems you could have as easily claimed
* Specifications - FWT Antennas can be built from 900 to 10,000 MHz.
if, in fact, that could be achieved.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC