Richard Clark wrote:

It takes no great effort to duplicate your rather sloppy presentation
to offer many better, smaller designs that eclipse your speculated
results. Through selective disclosure, choosing a weak competitor,
leaning on abused references, and one thumb on the scale, anyone can
inflate performance claims to satisfy a customer (or attract more).


I challenge anyone else to use
whatever Yagi Optimizers they have
to come up with a 3 element design
(to keep the size down) with a 180 degree
front lobe, and with an 11dB F/B ratio,
that has a greater than 4.5 dBi in the
front lobe. Plot the H-plane of your
simulation too.



Slick