Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 20:35:14 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote: The elevation angle of a radio wave is not related to antenna construction. It is calculated by trigonometry and is geometrically related to the distance between two points on the Earth's surface, the height of the ionospheric reflecting layers involved, and the number of hops. If a radio wave leaves the Earth at one end of the path and returns to Earth at the other end, then the elevation angles of the path taken are the same at both ends. And the same in the other direction. (To forestall nitpickers let it be said things can vary around averages.) The optimum angle at which to point a radio antenna, either for transmit or receive, is obviously the same as the elevation angle of the radio path. BUT NO AMOUNT OF WAVING THE ANTENNA ABOUT WILL AFFECT THE ELEVATION ANGLE OF THE RADIO PATH. For given points on the Earth's surface, height of reflecting layer, and number of hops, the angle of elevation of the radio path is fixed. The angle at which the radiation from an antenna is a maximum is an entirely different matter. Calculation of a path elevation angle on a curved Earth not very difficult but is a little too complicated to be written here. Up to 1500 groundpath miles the Earth can be considered to be flat. Trig calculation is then schoolkids stuff. Full formulae can be found in maths books under "Spherical Trigonometry" or in practical radio engineering books. Calculations can be interesting but are invariably roughly approximate because layer height involves guesswork. And by the time you've finished a calculation the height has shifted. Or the number of hops has changed from 2 to 3. The only things which remain static are your own latitude and longitude. To calculate propagation statistics of one and two hop radio paths, including elevation angles, download simple program TWOHOPS in a few seconds from website below and run immediately. The original poster, John, had already indicated the answer to his own question - but Reg was the only one who recognized that and had the correct follow up. Congrats, Reg. Bob, W9DMK, Dahlgren, VA Replace "nobody" with my callsign for e-mail http://www.qsl.net/w9dmk http://zaffora/f2o.org/W9DMK/W9dmk.html |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Radiation angle vs turns count in a coil | Antenna | |||
Electromagnetic radiation | Shortwave | |||
Serious radiation questin | Antenna | |||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | General | |||
Cardiod radiation pattern - 70 cm phased vertical dipoles | Antenna |