Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:38:15 -0400, Deane Charlson wrote: Hello, I have been using single-band half-wave dipoles for years. I would like to try some multi-band wire antennas and compare performance. I am considering using an Off Center Fed Dipole or a G5RV or a Carolina Windom. Any thoughts or experiences with these antennas as compared to a half-wave dipole? -- http://web.wt.net/~nm5k If strictly comparing performance, all three are inferior when compared to the coax fed dipoles. To be honest, I've tried all of the antennas you mention, and I have no use for any of them. I thought overall, they were pathetic. I agree, if you want to run all bands, just feed a dipole of the lowest band you want to run with ladder line. If you use a tuner, use the very least inductance to get a usable match. That will greatly reduce tuner losses. Nothing you try will beat a coax fed dipole for pure efficiency, unless you use a no-tuner method like Cecils no tuner ladder line setup. But careful use if the tuner will leave losses low enough to not really worry about. Well, unless you are like me, and want every last drop....I stick with parallel dipoles fed with a single coax. At the moment I have 80/40/20 dipoles on one line. I can use the tuner on other bands if needed. But those bands I get: no tuner needed, no tuner losses, the advantages of coax, and a normal dipole pattern on those bands. My total system losses are very low. I don't like using a tuner as you can probably tell. :/. I'll avoid it like the plague if possible. The OCF is prone to common mode problems. Same with the windom which is basically the same thing. The average storebought windom and G5RV's suffer from excess feedline losses due to the micky mouse feedline design. IE: coax to balun to ladder line to antenna...Add tuner loss for all band use...What a micky mouse mess... ![]() to both a storebought windom and a storebought G5RV at previous field days. Ate em for lunch. I mean absolutely tore em a new one...You could see a 2 S unit difference just in the efficiency difference. On theirs, everything would drop. Noise, signals, everything. Pattern was not an issue. Was a painful sight for the owners of those antennas. They had no clue they were that inferior until I A/B'ed those puppies using an antenna switch. ![]() better feed system. IE: dump all the garbage, and run ladder line the whole way. MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
shortened dipole loaded | Antenna | |||
Off Center Fed Dipole: the "Windom" experience. | Antenna | |||
Off Center Fed Dipole: Windom HSQ | Antenna | |||
Layout for G5RV twin feedline? | Antenna |