Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
More is not always better. As far as performance goes, some have suggested
that your antenna pattern can have more lobes (a bad thing) if you went with the 100' of wire vs. the 88'. Having a very lobey pattern makes it hard to determine where your signal is actually going, whereas having less lobes usually means your signal will radiate at 90 degree angles to the doublet antenna. See an article describing this at: http://www.cebik.com/aledz.html In the article, the author thinks 44' is the optimal length for a 40-10M antenna and 88' is the optimal length for an 80-20M antenna, assuming you want to maintain an accurate radiation pattern. 73, Dan "Jim Miller" wrote in message ... I'm putting up a centerfed doublet fed by ladderline and an antenna tuner in the backyard and have two trees to support it which are about 112ft apart. I could put up an 88 foot doublet between them easily. However would it be better to put up a full 100 footer (allowing for endline support) since I have to tune it anyway or is 88 foot a better choice? It will be used for hambands as well as swl. tnx jtm |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
88 ft + 66 ft fanned doublet? | Antenna | |||
88 ft. Doublet Question | Antenna | |||
G5RV or 135 foot doublet or Carolina Windom? | Antenna | |||
Question on antenna symantics | Antenna | |||
Feeding a doublet | Antenna |