Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy and Walter,
CHOKE BALUNS. Keep it simple. Why make a song and dance about it? The pair of wires wound on a choke balun behave as an inductive choke for longitudinal currents and as a transmission line for balanced currents. The two circuits, line and choke, behave independently of each other. The actual current on a wire, if anyone should ever wish to know, is just the arithmetical sum of the other two. All authors omit to say that the the pair of transmission line wires need not be coaxial. They can be a balanced twin line such as a length of stranded flexible speaker cable. Or just a pair of insulated wires laid alongside each other. Or twisted. Not only is the twin-line mechanically more convenient to construct, it has electrical advantages. Its Zo is intermediate between the high and low terminating impedances. Typically Zo is about 120 -130 ohms. The geometric mean of 50 and 300 ohms is 122 ohms. Not that this matters very much because the device is never terminated in its nominal impedances. Twin line also has a higher velocity factor than 50-ohm coax. The length of line wound on the choke behaves as an impedance transformer. So it seriously, but not harmfully, affects the impedance presented to the tuner. The tuner LC settings may be beneficially affected. Otherwise the transformation ratio, which heavily depends on frequency, is not of consquence. Preferably, the length of twin-line wound on the choke should be less than 1/8th of a wavelength long at its own velocity at the highest operating frequency. It is not too difficult to construct a choke balun which has sufficient inductive choking reactance at 1.8 MHz without the transmission line exceeding 1/8 wavelengths at 30 MHz. ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A few further comments.
For perfectionists, the attenuation along a twin-line wound on a choke balun, is appreciably less than a coaxial line of about the same length. This is due to the lower Zo of the coax and also due to the very small inner coaxial conductor diameter and its higher loss resistance. This is not of great conseqence. The length of line involved is quite small anyway. Less than 1/8th wavelengths at the highest frequency of interest. The power-handling and voltage-handling ability of twin-line is also greater than coax line. So, in general, a choke balun wound with Radio Shack, 18 SWG speaker cable, is cheap, easier to construct, works better, and is more power efficient than the small-bore coax usually used. ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | General | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Info | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Info | |||
Antenna Questions | Shortwave |