Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wes Stewart wrote:
You are comparing a mess of wire with a ideal lumped inductor. Apples and oranges. Not my fault. Why does EZNEC treat these two inductances so differently? If you really want to model this stuff accurately take a few hundred $K out of your next retirement check and buy a high frequency structure simulator. No thanks, Wes. I can live without that. But let me ask you a question. If there is a one degree delay through one foot of copper wire, how can there be a zero delay through 20 feet of wire coiled into a one foot coil? Given the pressure on the electrons, one would expect 20 times the delay through the coil as through the one foot wire. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |