On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 18:00:30 -0800, "John Smith"
wrote:
Rather, back to my original question (your ADD--attention defecit disorder
is showing), "Anyone ever done a helical wound "Slim Jim?""

Hi "Jack,"

I suppose it has to be said if this is going anywhe Yes.

Is this 20 questions, or do you have any answers for yourself?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Apparently, I am not like you, I don't have all the answers and am just
sitting here ready to educate all the poor ignorant masses who have
questions.
I am amazed my motives can even be brought into question, to the
intelligent, I have suspected would be obvious.
I am interested in what others know, or think they know--I am interested in
things I do NOT yet know..
While if I am able to help someone with information in my possession--I will
quite willingly do so, however, I first need to gain this information.
Somehow, from all your posts, I am left with the impression you were
probably born knowing all the answers and, if not, you are now in the
possession of such and, all others serve only as an anoyance to you--so I
can see how you would puzzle over some ignorant A$$ such as myself.

Regards
--
Hay, if'n ya'll cun't konstructivly partecipete in this disscusion, haw
aboot speel-checkin it fer me?


"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 18:00:30 -0800, "John Smith"
wrote:
Rather, back to my original question (your ADD--attention defecit disorder
is showing), "Anyone ever done a helical wound "Slim Jim?""

Hi "Jack,"

I suppose it has to be said if this is going anywhe Yes.

Is this 20 questions, or do you have any answers for yourself?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

John
Cut off the conversation, it is not worth it.
Richard just loves to fight and show how smart he is and
if this doesn't work, which is generally, the case he goes
on a personal attack.
Generally he is not worth the attention.
And the more agitated he gets the more he reverts to use of
the long words instead of short words and scrambles his answers
so all are confused as to what he is saying, why he is saying it as
well as what benefit he thinks he is supplying by typing it.
The bottom line is that his intention is to destroy the integrity
of his opponent rather than to assist with courtesy.
And rest assured, he views all as an oponnent
Just making a point
No reply required
Regards
Art


"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Apparently, I am not like you, I don't have all the answers and am just
sitting here ready to educate all the poor ignorant masses who have
questions.
I am amazed my motives can even be brought into question, to the
intelligent, I have suspected would be obvious.
I am interested in what others know, or think they know--I am interested
in things I do NOT yet know..
While if I am able to help someone with information in my possession--I
will quite willingly do so, however, I first need to gain this
information.
Somehow, from all your posts, I am left with the impression you were
probably born knowing all the answers and, if not, you are now in the
possession of such and, all others serve only as an anoyance to you--so I
can see how you would puzzle over some ignorant A$$ such as myself.

Regards
--
Hay, if'n ya'll cun't konstructivly partecipete in this disscusion, haw
aboot speel-checkin it fer me?


"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 18:00:30 -0800, "John Smith"
wrote:
Rather, back to my original question (your ADD--attention defecit
disorder
is showing), "Anyone ever done a helical wound "Slim Jim?""

Hi "Jack,"

I suppose it has to be said if this is going anywhe Yes.

Is this 20 questions, or do you have any answers for yourself?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:09:27 GMT, "
wrote:

Just making a point

Hi Art,

You could use a blunt.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:09:27 GMT, "
wrote:


Just making a point


Hi Art,

You could use a blunt.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard, I'm guessing that you have no idea what you said in
semi-current slang.

tom
K0TAR

Tom, I am just guessing, but are you referring to medicinal marijuanna?
grin

Regards

--
Hay, if'n ya'll cun't konstructivly partecipete in this har disscusion, haw
aboot speel-checkin it fer me?


"Tom Ring" wrote in message
.. .
Richard Clark wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:09:27 GMT, "
wrote:


Just making a point


Hi Art,

You could use a blunt. 73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard, I'm guessing that you have no idea what you said in semi-current
slang.

tom
K0TAR

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:31:13 -0600, Tom Ring
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:09:27 GMT, "
wrote:


Just making a point


Hi Art,

You could use a blunt.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard, I'm guessing that you have no idea what you said in
semi-current slang.

Hi Tom,

Guessing and supposing seem to be de Rigueur. Let's look at it
through deconstruction (the convolutions of language used here are to
thin out the shallow end of the grammatical pool) and let me ask:
"Considering your reaction, Art's stimulus by which I made my
suggestion, and the comment itself: does all this maintain a
consistent, internal logic?"

If I were to deconstruct further, I would offer the query:
"How current is semi?"

If we reach back beyond the currency of semi (say 3 or more decades);
then I would have offered Art:
"Keep a tight ass hole."
and it would have still come from the same culture.

Now, at the risk of having to "explain" to a generation that demands
facts and references, and then shows so little inclination to actually
apply them (this does not mean you by the way as you have been
adventurous enough to probably have made connections anyway); then my
short answer would be:
"You've guessed wrong." (which is a far more commonplace outcome
by virtue of this preponderance of guessing, presuming, and supposing
instead of testing, analyzing, and examining).

5 points to the one who can name the source to the ancient (nearly 40
year old) quote offered. 5 extra points if you can provide the
context (fictional character) who employs it. And 10 points bonus if
you can name (fictional character) who it is applied to.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

"Richard Clark"
5 points to the one who can name the source to the ancient (nearly
40 year old) quote offered. 5 extra points if you can provide the
context (fictional character) who employs it. And 10 points bonus if
you can name (fictional character) who it is applied to.
__________________

Using scientific texts and methods rather than a thesaurus and fictional
references to try to make your points here would serve you (and the rest of
us) better.

Or you might wish to move to alt.english.usage, and see if those folks are
impressed.

RF

Richard Clark wrote:


If I were to deconstruct further, I would offer the query:
"How current is semi?"

1 decade.


If we reach back beyond the currency of semi (say 3 or more decades);
then I would have offered Art:
"Keep a tight ass hole."
and it would have still come from the same culture.

Now, at the risk of having to "explain" to a generation that demands
facts and references, and then shows so little inclination to actually
apply them (this does not mean you by the way as you have been
adventurous enough to probably have made connections anyway); then my
short answer would be:
"You've guessed wrong." (which is a far more commonplace outcome
by virtue of this preponderance of guessing, presuming, and supposing
instead of testing, analyzing, and examining).

5 points to the one who can name the source to the ancient (nearly 40
year old) quote offered. 5 extra points if you can provide the
context (fictional character) who employs it. And 10 points bonus if
you can name (fictional character) who it is applied to.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


Hmm, I'd say about 61 years +-1 on the quote, and I couldn't guess who
used it 40 years ago.

And blunt is now a drug reference if you haven't kept up.

So who was it that recycled the combat advice?

tom
K0TAR

wrote:
And the more agitated he gets the more he reverts to use of
the long words instead of short words and scrambles his answers
so all are confused as to what he is saying, why he is saying it as
well as what benefit he thinks he is supplying by typing it.

Art, I once has a fuzz-phrase card with ten words in each
of three columns. One picked three numbers at random and
looked up the words for inclusion in a memo or paper. One
possibility might be "integrated quantitized phenomenon".
I suspect Richard C. has some rather sophisticated fuzz-
phrase software at his disposal. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---