"Richard Clark" wrote
It's satisfying enough to see you're stunned. ;-)
That was the point of the sieve.
__________________

Your perception of that is as inaccurate as the one you espouse about loaded
verticals. Are you incapable of dealing with technical topics in a
technical manner?

I suppose now you'll claim that your post above was another sieve, and
congratulate yourself all over again.

RF

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:52:24 -0600, "Richard Fry"
wrote:

Are you incapable of dealing with technical topics in a
technical manner?

Hi OM,

I respond to all correspondence of interest. I see you enjoy talk
about talking about technical topics, but I have seen no technical
discussion from you for quite some time. That is your sole
responsibility as no one can do your typing for you.

I suppose now

Yes, but too often.

This is what I mean about choice and responsibility. You chose to
ramble on instead of offering technical discussion. I am equally
pleased to travel either path, and I suspect your protestation above
given the inclination obviously revealed below it.

So to match your diverging interests, can you answer
"What does Do Wa Diddy mean?"

If your heart of heart's desire for technical topics must be sated
first
What effect would surface phonon polaritons present to an
antenna's efficiency?

Either constitute another sieve. ;-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

"Richard Clark" wrote:

Drivel not worth serious consideration.

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:08:33 -0600, "Richard Fry"
wrote:

"Richard Clark" wrote:

Drivel not worth serious consideration.

Hi OM,

The sieve succeeded. We can eliminate popular music as serious
consideration from your vast repertoire of experience. It appears you
are somewhat constrained on the topic of Polaritons (Plasmons to some)
too. In the future I will try to dumb down the technical and elevate
the popular. By some accounts we would end up discussing Shakespeare
again!

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

"Richard Clark" wrote
In the future I will try to dumb down the technical and elevate
the popular.
____________

You can't dumb down your technical content much more than you already have.
It's essentially zero now. And don't bother us with your "popular"
rhetoric. It's only popular with you, I'm afraid.

RF

Richard Fry wrote:

"Richard Clark" wrote

In the future I will try to dumb down the technical and elevate
the popular.

____________

You can't dumb down your technical content much more than you already
have. It's essentially zero now. And don't bother us with your
"popular" rhetoric. It's only popular with you, I'm afraid.


So this is what antenna expert discourase is like?

- Mike KB3EIA -

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:36:44 -0500, Michael Coslo
wrote:
So this is what antenna expert discourase is like?

Hi Mike,

No, that was abandoned long ago and an attempt to draw it back with a
novel topic of surface phonon polariton efficiency hits on antennas
was similarly abandoned as too easy (? who can tell what will lead to
a 600 entry thread?). However, the question:
"What does Do Wa Diddy mean?"
predictably blew a fuse.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC