LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old April 7th 05, 06:09 AM
Richard Harrison
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John Smith wrote:
"However, I am looking at a REAL and functional antenna which appears to
be well matched and receiving well."

Congratulationns!

In a previous posting, I quoted Dr. Arnold King who wrote prior to 1945:
"The accurate calculation of the (antenna) input impedance at AB of the
modified antenna as a function of the impedance (presented to the
matching section) and the (wire) lengths AC and BD has not been
accomplished."

If it were easy to calculate, they would have done it. They had
excellent marhematicians prior to 1945, too. The implication is that you
find the match by trial. John proved he could do it.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
please need help with delta loop antenna better matching system than gamma match Silvio Antenna 4 November 15th 04 08:42 PM
Problem with Gamma Match? Jason Dugas Antenna 1 August 13th 04 03:22 AM
Gamma match question 6-meter yagi Shadow 998 Antenna 9 June 22nd 04 02:05 AM
Gamma Match g subs Antenna 2 March 20th 04 03:42 PM
Gamma match: Inherently inferior to balanced match systems? Cecil Moore Antenna 5 September 24th 03 04:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017