Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Roy Lewallen wrote: .... At frequencies from at least HF well into the UHF range or higher, the loss in transmission lines having decent insulation (e.g., PE or PTFE) is almost all due to conductor loss rather than dielectric loss. Higher impedance line has lower loss simply because for a given amount of power being conveyed, the current is lower. Therefore, the conductor I^2 * R loss (which is nearly the total loss) is lower. If you introduce a dielectric material (other than air) between conductors, the characteristic impedance drops and the velocity factor increases, due to the same effect. Only in that way are they related in a ladder line. Here's a slightly different way to look at the same thing Roy has said. For a given coaxial cable outer conductor diameter, assuming smooth copper conductors, there's a particular ratio of D/d (outer to inner conductor diameters) that gives you the lowest loss. So long as there's negligible loss in the dielectric, that D/d is independent of what dielectric you put in there. But since putting in a dielectric lowers the impedance, the loss goes up as a result of higher current for a given power level. You can put numbers on it pretty easily. Assuming no dielectric loss, the attenuation of the line in dB per unit length is inversely proportional to the line impedance: dB/100ft = 4.34*Rt/Zo, where Rt is the total RF resistance of the wires. But Zo is inversely proportional to the square root of the relative dielectric constant of the dielectric in the line. Putting the two together, for a given conductor configuration (D and d in coax), if there's no loss in the dielectric itself and only loss in the resistance of the wires, the loss in dB/unit length is proportional to the square root of the net effective dielectric constant around the line. Since the velocity factor is inversely proportional to the square root of the same net effective dielectric constant, then for a given configuration of conductors, the loss is indeed dependent on the velocity factor, even with no power dissipated in the dielectric itself. This is true for coax and open wire line in equal measure. But beware that you are more likely to have dielectric loss in open-wire line for a variety of reasons... For lossless dielectric and a fixed conductor configuration (coaxial, two-wire, or other TEM line with fixed conductor sizes and spacings), varying just the dielectric, then, dB/unit length = k1/v.f. = k2/Zo = k3*sqrt(net effective dielectric constant) where k1, k2 and k3 are proportionality constants depending on the conductor configuration. Cheers, Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Shortwave | |||
Comet B-10 VHF Antenna Question | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna |