LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
Old April 5th 05, 08:07 PM
K7ITM
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Roy Lewallen wrote:
....
At frequencies from at least HF well into the UHF range or higher,

the
loss in transmission lines having decent insulation (e.g., PE or

PTFE)
is almost all due to conductor loss rather than dielectric loss.

Higher
impedance line has lower loss simply because for a given amount of

power
being conveyed, the current is lower. Therefore, the conductor I^2 *

R
loss (which is nearly the total loss) is lower.

If you introduce a dielectric material (other than air) between
conductors, the characteristic impedance drops and the velocity

factor
increases, due to the same effect. Only in that way are they related

in
a ladder line.


Here's a slightly different way to look at the same thing Roy has said.
For a given coaxial cable outer conductor diameter, assuming smooth
copper conductors, there's a particular ratio of D/d (outer to inner
conductor diameters) that gives you the lowest loss. So long as
there's negligible loss in the dielectric, that D/d is independent of
what dielectric you put in there. But since putting in a dielectric
lowers the impedance, the loss goes up as a result of higher current
for a given power level.

You can put numbers on it pretty easily. Assuming no dielectric loss,
the attenuation of the line in dB per unit length is inversely
proportional to the line impedance: dB/100ft = 4.34*Rt/Zo, where Rt is
the total RF resistance of the wires. But Zo is inversely proportional
to the square root of the relative dielectric constant of the
dielectric in the line. Putting the two together, for a given
conductor configuration (D and d in coax), if there's no loss in the
dielectric itself and only loss in the resistance of the wires, the
loss in dB/unit length is proportional to the square root of the net
effective dielectric constant around the line. Since the velocity
factor is inversely proportional to the square root of the same net
effective dielectric constant, then for a given configuration of
conductors, the loss is indeed dependent on the velocity factor, even
with no power dissipated in the dielectric itself. This is true for
coax and open wire line in equal measure. But beware that you are more
likely to have dielectric loss in open-wire line for a variety of
reasons...

For lossless dielectric and a fixed conductor configuration (coaxial,
two-wire, or other TEM line with fixed conductor sizes and spacings),
varying just the dielectric, then,

dB/unit length = k1/v.f. = k2/Zo = k3*sqrt(net effective dielectric
constant)

where k1, k2 and k3 are proportionality constants depending on the
conductor configuration.

Cheers,
Tom

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] William Mcfadden Shortwave 1 January 1st 04 06:05 PM
Comet B-10 VHF Antenna Question Ed Antenna 6 October 21st 03 04:40 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Complex line Z0: A numerical example Roy Lewallen Antenna 11 September 13th 03 01:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017