| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 23:27:29 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote: "Wes Stewart" wrote The line length *is* a factor, however, they give a simplified approximation for the case of a length more than 20 times the line spacing and the line spacing less than 1/10 lambda. P/I^2 = 160 * ( pi * D / lambda)^2 whe P is in watts I is the RMS current in a matched line D / lambda is the wire spacing in wavelengths =================================== I don't see line length in the formula. That's because for the condition of length 20 * spacing it drops out. What do they say about line lengths less than 20 times wire spacing for small spacings? They say a whole bunch of things in a complicated formula full of cosine integrals, etc. Too complicated to express here in plain ASCII. I'll try to scan it to pdf and post is somewhere. Wes |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Shortwave | |||
| Comet B-10 VHF Antenna Question | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
| Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna | |||