Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 23:27:29 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote: "Wes Stewart" wrote The line length *is* a factor, however, they give a simplified approximation for the case of a length more than 20 times the line spacing and the line spacing less than 1/10 lambda. P/I^2 = 160 * ( pi * D / lambda)^2 whe P is in watts I is the RMS current in a matched line D / lambda is the wire spacing in wavelengths =================================== I don't see line length in the formula. That's because for the condition of length 20 * spacing it drops out. What do they say about line lengths less than 20 times wire spacing for small spacings? They say a whole bunch of things in a complicated formula full of cosine integrals, etc. Too complicated to express here in plain ASCII. I'll try to scan it to pdf and post is somewhere. Wes |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Shortwave | |||
Comet B-10 VHF Antenna Question | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna |