Roger Conroy wrote:
You guys are ducking the question - Can you define "Changes" without
referring to time?

Referring to God doesn't prove the existence of God except
as a concept in the human mind. Referring to time doesn't
prove the existence of time except as a concept in the human
mind.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Cecil:



Now you told 'em that, they will know we can TALK about "God" (the concept)
without, necessarily, BELIEVING in "God."



You are as bad as Richard, you spoil the fun!!!! wink



Warmest regards,

John

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
| Roger Conroy wrote:
| You guys are ducking the question - Can you define "Changes" without
| referring to time?
|
| Referring to God doesn't prove the existence of God except
| as a concept in the human mind. Referring to time doesn't
| prove the existence of time except as a concept in the human
| mind.
| --
| 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
|
|
| ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
| http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000
Newsgroups
| ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---