Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:41:22 -0400, "Tam/WB2TT"
wrote: I ran an EZNEC simulation on a pair of crossed dipoles at 3.7 and 4.5 MHz, with a 7.2 MHz inverted V below the 3.7. Not good. The 7.2 works OK, but the 4.5 really messes up the 3.7. Among other things the impedance at 3.7 and 4.5 MHz is about 115 Ohms. I ran the simulation at 50 feet above average ground. If the 4.5 is for receive only, I would forget about it, and take the 10:1 SWR that the 80 meter dipole gives you. Good evening, Tam. Thanks for running the simulation for me. Your results don't surprise me much. (I'm going to have to get that EZNEC program and play with it for a while ... thanks to all for mentioning it.) The 4.5-MHz antenna will be used for transmitting as well as receiving, and so I need to get the SWR down to something reasonable. I guess there's no reason why I can't just put up a separate dipole for 4.5 MHz and the crossed dipoles, fed with a single coax, for 80 and 40. I could also (and I might...) just put up an 80-meter dipole fed with ladder line and use a tuner, though I was trying to avoid the tuner. Thanks (to you and to all) for saving me a bunch of work. :-) CJ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Shortwave | |||
Antenna tuner is nessasry for TWO-TURN coax loop?? | Antenna | |||
Interested in high-performance tube-based AM tuner designs | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |