Gene Fuller wrote:
There is no need to invoke interference or wave cancellation to explain
anything, ...

But there is, Gene. It's the only way to correct the present
misinformation and old wives' tales being promoted on this
newsgroup. It is obvious that the r.r.a.a poster who
understands the role that interference plays in the
conservation of RF energy is very rare.

There is a conspiracy to keep this information from
surfacing - "Nothing new", "no need", "irrelevant",
"who cares?" Why are you guys afraid to discuss the
technical details?

This should be an easy question to answer. If two coherent
waves of 50 joules/sec each, are traveling in the same
path in the same direction and are 180 degrees out of
phase, they cancel in that direction of travel. What
happens to their 50+50 joules/sec? Hint: energy doesn't
cancel and there are only two possible directions. Can
you spell R-E-F-L-E-C-T-I-O-N?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----