Cecil Moore wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote:

Does your analysis produce the result of 2.3 dB loss claimed by H.
for a 1.7:1 SWR?


Cheap friggin' damn shot, Roy, after my posting where I disagreed
with H. and agreed with your calculations.

Sorry, it was an honest question. I saw your posting re the SWR
calculations, but guess I missed the one you mention. H's calculations
remain a mystery to me, as apparently they do to you.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Roy Lewallen wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:

Roy Lewallen wrote:
Does your analysis produce the result of 2.3 dB loss claimed by H.
for a 1.7:1 SWR?

Cheap friggin' damn shot, Roy, after my posting where I disagreed
with H. and agreed with your calculations.

Sorry, it was an honest question. I saw your posting re the SWR
calculations, but guess I missed the one you mention. H's calculations
remain a mystery to me, as apparently they do to you.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Really strange response since you already responded to the posting
where I agreed with you. Are you as senile as I? :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----