Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 07:40:49 GMT, "nick smith"
wrote: ... "Cecil Moore" says - There's no such thing as a 100% efficient tuner. ==================================== Cecil, not a very surprising statement. There's nothing which is 100% efficient. What is the typical efficiency of a typical tuner with a typical antenna. Does it differ significantly from 100% ? Yes or no? ---- Reg. Well, at the risk of David going into conflict with the Goliaths of the newsgroups, I would reckon that a tuner (matcher ?) must be a pretty efficient device as it doesn't get very warm from wasting energy as heat - or perhaps my aerials are a reasonably good match and the tuner isn't doing any / much work. Let me refer to you to this link: http://users.triconet.org/wesandlinda/ladder.htm and suggest that you also follow the imbedded link to my letter to Dean. There you will find an analysis if what tuner losses can be. But let's also answer this issue of "It doesn't get hot, so it must not be lossy." First let's say that, unless the op is a real blabbermouth, the transmit duty cycle will be 50%. Transmit half the time, listen half the time. If the op is on CW then the duty cycle of the transmit cycle is ~44%. (The standard word "PARIS" sent repeatedly with 1:3:7 spacing. So for CW operation, the overall duty cycle is .5 * .44 = 22%. On SSB it's more complicated. Without speech processing, the peak to average ratio is variously given, but 14:1 (11.5 dB) is typical. Most rigs have some form of speech compression or clipping these days (most used to excess). Really effective clippers, (ahem) http://users.triconet.org/wesandlinda/s_proc.pdf can improve this quite a bit so let's say that it's 6 dB. So the average power is 6 dB below the peak or 25% of the peak. Our overall duty cycle is .5 * .25 = 12.5% Of course the digital modes and FM are full carrier so the duty cycle is 50%. Not many using FM on hf where tuners are the norm, the PSK guys pride themselves on QRP, which leaves only the special case RTTY contesters running full power. So back to the guy running 100 W CW through a tuner driving a ladder line fed antenna. If his tuner burns up half of the power will it get hot? Are 11 W (22% of 50) going to smoke most components? What if the tuner loss is 6 dB? The average power dissipation climbs to a whopping 16.5 W. (22% of 75) Is this a big thermal management issue? Certainly, KW rigs running RTTY are going to be a bigger concern, but the tuners (and component parts) are commensurately bigger and can dissipate more power without "getting hot". |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
160 Meter Band Balanced Coaxial Receiving Loop Antrenna by KN4LF | Shortwave | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Shortwave | |||
80 meter multi turn loop antenna | Antenna | |||
Should I run a Sky-wire loop? | Dx |