Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... "Cecil Moore" says - There's no such thing as a 100% efficient tuner. ==================================== Cecil, not a very surprising statement. There's nothing which is 100% efficient. What is the typical efficiency of a typical tuner with a typical antenna. Does it differ significantly from 100% ? Yes or no? ---- Reg. I did some measurments on a MFJ tuner into a dummy load. While I am not sure if the losses would be more or less than to an acutal antenna, I would assume it should be the best case . The losses were around 5 to 10 watts starting with 100 watts input depending on the band. I think 80 meters was the worse from 80 to 10 meters. This is a small tumer rated around 200 or 300 watts and has a built in wattmeter. This may account for a small aditional loss. I did not use this meter but did use 2 Bird meters , one on the input and one on the output to keep the input power constant at 100 watts. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
160 Meter Band Balanced Coaxial Receiving Loop Antrenna by KN4LF | Shortwave | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Shortwave | |||
80 meter multi turn loop antenna | Antenna | |||
Should I run a Sky-wire loop? | Dx |