LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #28   Report Post  
Old June 13th 05, 06:57 PM
Tim Wescott
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bill Turner wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:48:46 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:


Most astronomers don't believe the
red shift is pure Doppler effect.


Correct. Much of it appears to be from the expansion of the universe.
The effects can be shown to be different.

_________________________________________________

I'm not an astronomer but I've wondered about that too. Perhaps the red
shift from distant objects is just simply caused by the photons
gradually losing energy after a few billion years. A lower energy photon
means a longer wavelength, i.e. a red shift.


That was actually posited in the 1920's, and tested -- the answer was
"nope".

The lost energy could explain the "background radiation" of the cosmos.

I think God likes playing with our minds. I would if I were him. :-)



--
-------------------------------------------
Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna RHF Shortwave 1 January 24th 05 09:37 PM
Discone antenna plans [email protected] Antenna 13 January 14th 05 11:51 PM
Yaesu FT-857D questions Joe S. Equipment 6 October 25th 04 09:40 AM
EH Antenna Revisited Walter Maxwell Antenna 47 January 16th 04 04:34 AM
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod Soliloquy Scanner 11 October 11th 03 01:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017