Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Turner wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:48:46 -0500, Cecil Moore wrote: Most astronomers don't believe the red shift is pure Doppler effect. Correct. Much of it appears to be from the expansion of the universe. The effects can be shown to be different. _________________________________________________ I'm not an astronomer but I've wondered about that too. Perhaps the red shift from distant objects is just simply caused by the photons gradually losing energy after a few billion years. A lower energy photon means a longer wavelength, i.e. a red shift. That was actually posited in the 1920's, and tested -- the answer was "nope". The lost energy could explain the "background radiation" of the cosmos. I think God likes playing with our minds. I would if I were him. :-) -- ------------------------------------------- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Discone antenna plans | Antenna | |||
Yaesu FT-857D questions | Equipment | |||
EH Antenna Revisited | Antenna | |||
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod | Scanner |